Laserfiche WebLink
JUIN 111986 BOOK 64 FAct 68® <br />one residential piece of property, and believed that the <br />resulting congestion would make this an inappropriate location <br />for a child care facility. He further believed that the County <br />would have to 4 -lane 20th Avenue from 8th Street to 12th Street <br />at some point in the future and hoped the residents would <br />cooperate in that project when the time comes. <br />ON MOTION by Commissioner Wodtke, SECONDED by <br />Commissioner Bowman, the Board unanimously denied <br />the request by Turner Builders for special exception <br />approval of the location of a child care facility at <br />20th Avenue and 12th Street. <br />WEST COUNTY REGIONAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT EFFLUENT DISPOSAL <br />FEASIBILITY STUDY <br />The Board reviewed the following memo dated 5/30/86: <br />TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DATE: MAY 30, 1986 <br />THRU: L.S. THOMAS <br />ACTING ADMINISTRATOR <br />VIA: TERRANCE G. PINTO <br />DIRECTOR, UTILITY S RVICES <br />FROM: RONALD R. BROOKS <br />ENVIRONMENTAL EN INEERING SPECIALIST <br />SUBJECT: WEST COUNTY REGIONAL WASTE WATER TREATMENT PLANT <br />EFFLUENT DISPOSAL FEASIBILITY STUDY <br />BACKGROUND <br />In December of 1985 the Board of County Commissioners authorized the <br />engineering firm, Camp, Dresser & McKee, Inc., to perform a feasi- <br />bility study on effluent disposal alternatives for the County's west <br />regional wastewater treatment plant. The feasibility study was <br />necessary because there were concerns as to the adequacy of the <br />plant site for disposal of anticipated future wastewater flows. In <br />addition, numerous existing wastewater systems along the state road <br />60 corridor were wanting to tie into the plant thereby necessitating <br />an expansion of the plant and effluent disposal system much sooner <br />than had been anticipated. <br />Exhibit I is a copy of the completed feasibility report. In the <br />report you may note that additional effluent disposal sites will be <br />necessary to accomodate flows from future development as well as <br />flows from existing facilities that will be connecting to the County <br />system. <br />18 <br />