6/25/1986 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

JUN 2 5 1986 Bou 64 Fa IJ y Vice Chairman Lyons felt a further alternative was not to change the ordinance at all. Commissioner Wodtke asked how the City handles docks in their jurisdiction, and Attorney Vitunac believed in the City it • is a legal use and a dock can be built without any special permit. Discussion continued and Planning Director Keating believed there are two issues - does the Board wish to allow this to occur, and if so, how. He noted that in the meeting the Attorneys and he had with representatives from The Moorings, several conditions were suggested, one of which being that even though the dock could be put there, it couldn't be used until the primary structure is there and that a bond would be put up that it would have to be removed if it was used. The property owners' concern is to get the doc!in to vest it in case of some kind of moratorium or ' prohibition in the future because of the manatee issue. Commissioner Wodtke asked if the Association or the development couldn't have that restriction themselves without it being a general requirement of the entire county, and Attorney Barkett agreed that would be fine for The Moorings, but not all of the properties which desire docks are in a subdivision. Director Keating commented that staff's concern if these accessory uses are allowed before the principal use, is that they not become a detriment to the community and be used for purposes they really shouldn't be used for. Commissioner Wodtke noted that in order to amend the ordi- nance, we need a public hearing and suggested that we discuss both alternatives at that hearing and get the public input. Attorney Vitunac suggested that perhaps we need to determine first whether we want to change the policy as the only ones expressing concern were a small group from The Moorings. Commissioner Wodtke believed there is concern from other areas throughout the county. This is allowable within the City, 32