My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7/2/1986
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1986
>
7/2/1986
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:53:02 AM
Creation date
6/12/2015 12:35:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
07/02/1986
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
80
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
presence of Sonny Dean, Neal Schopke and Bill Baird. At that <br />point they just closed the door on him. <br />Mr. Crosby 'next read aloud a telegram sent to his attention <br />at Schopke Construction: "Re: Indian River County Jail - Phase <br />II, Area C, Vero Beach, Florida -- "Regret we cannot meet a <br />Lower figure of $327,500 obtained by your firm after bid time. <br />We expect a subcontract for $379,000, which amount was quoted <br />prior to bid time and used by you in preparing your bid as <br />evidenced by your listing of Willo Products. In the interest of <br />the time scheduled, we urge that you act promptly." Mr. Crosby <br />stated that there are a couple of things wrong with this <br />telegram. At no time did he ever ask them to lower their price <br />to $327,500. Mr. Jim Barnes of Willo asked him what kind of <br />ballpark figure he was looking at and those are the figures that <br />he could work with. Mr. Barnes further stated that Schopke used <br />Willo's price, which is not true. If Mr. Barnes had been in his <br />office while he put the bid together, he could give some credence <br />to his statement, but this is not the case. Mr. Crosby pointed <br />out that there are just too many circumstances and too much hard <br />core stance. Never in all his years as a general contractor has <br />he seen a subcontractor so determined to ride roughshod over a <br />general contractor as there has been in this case. While he did <br />not feel there was anything illegal or any collusion by anyone in <br />the County.or the architect's office to stay with Willo, he felt <br />that possibly Willo misconstrued some innocent statements. <br />Admitting that it was secondhand information, he repeated that <br />Norman Dean was specifically told by the architect that Willo <br />would be used on this project. <br />Commissioner Wodtke wanted it on record that there is no <br />relationship between Sonny Dean of the County and Norman Dean of <br />Dean Products. <br />Commissioner Lyons asked Mr. Crosby if he was saying that <br />the County conspired to find a way for Willo to make up their <br />69 <br />BOOK 64 f't.uC 899 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.