7/15/1986 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

�UL 15 196 BOOK 65 FF,;E 38 this configuration had been left intact. He did not see this as a reason to take some commercial zoning from one individual to give it to someone else. In regard to the CL on the Ansin property, Commissioner Bird pointed out that hundreds of acres of commercial property were taken away from Mr. Ansin when we eliminated that strip zoning out there and created the node, and he believed some of the reasoning why so much of it was left on that side of the road was as a sort of trade-off or compromise. - Planner Keating commented that this conformed with the policy which was to encourage nodes to be developed on all quadrants of an intersection, and we generally would not put commercial besides a school and a cemetery; it was more appropriate to put the node where it was shown. Eric Fischer came before the Board and read a statement from Henry Fischer, owner of an 105 acre residential subdivision adjacent to the subject property, opposing the requested zoning change. Dr. Fischer believed there is no need for this much commercial in this location and felt property adjacent to a school is a poor location for any commercial zoning. In further discussion re the location oftheFischer property, it was determined that it is within 600' of the subject property. Mr. Miller noted what they are asking for doesn't touch the Fischer property and he did not feel it would affect it. Discussion continued re the Board's feelings about this request, and the Chairman and Commissioner Bowman indicated they would vote to deny. Commissioner Wodtke asked if there are 50 acres in the CL right now, and Planner Shearer advised that there are 34 acres of undeveloped commercially zoned land in this 50 acre node. Commissioner Wodtke noted that apparently in order to create any additional, we would have to increase the size of the node as the only other alternative is to take it away from somebody else, 37