My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7/23/1986
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1986
>
7/23/1986
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:53:03 AM
Creation date
6/12/2015 12:44:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
07/23/1986
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
92
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
r --j U L Ile 3 1906, <br />Bou 65 FA ct 170 <br />71st Street (Cemetery Road) and South Winter Beach Road be <br />redesignated from LD -2, Low-density Residential 2 (up to 6 <br />units/acre), *to LD -1, Low -Density Residential 1 (up to 3 <br />units/acre). The Winter Beach residents feel that the. LD -1 <br />designation would give them additional protection from <br />"high-density" development than the current designation on the <br />PLUM (see Figure 3). <br />Alternative 2: The Planning Department's Plan <br />Due to the controversy brought about by the recent rezoning <br />applications for property located on North Winter Beach Road, the <br />staff feels that a more detailed PLUM for the area located west <br />of Old Dixie Highway and east of Kings Highway may be necessary. <br />The staff feels that, due to the proximity of this area to U.S. 1 <br />and the designation of North Winter Beach Road as a primary <br />collector on the Thoroughfare Plan, the area should retain its <br />LD -2 designation on the Land Use Map. The land use designation <br />is aimed at future development and due to the lack of public <br />water and wastewater systems, the present situation will not <br />allow development at that level. The staff recommends that the <br />resident's concerns over density and whether land should be for <br />single-family or multiple -family uses should be addressed through <br />the policies in the PLUM and by zoning regulations. Figure 3 <br />illustrates the Planning Department's recommended alternative for <br />revision of the Winter Beach PLUM. The staff feels that the area <br />between 71st Street (Cemetery Road) and South Winter Beach Road <br />from Old Dixie Highway to the Lateral G Canal should retain its 6 <br />unitiacre zoning designation. Staff also recommends that a 300 <br />�—Oot multiple -family buffer be designated along the northern and <br />western boundary of the So'ith Winter -Beach Road Industrial Node. <br />Alternative Two also designates the area west of the Lateral G <br />Canal from the southern boundary of Hobart Park to South Winter <br />Beach Road as single-family residential with a maximum density of. <br />3 units/acre.- <br />Based <br />nits/acre. <br />Based on staff's reevaluation of Mr. Eddie Smith's property, <br />which is located on 69th Street, and west of Lateral "G" Canal <br />and surrounded on three sides by Hobart Park, the Planning <br />Department proposes to designate Mr. Smith's "property as <br />single-family residential (up to 6 units/acre). <br />RECOMMENDATION <br />Based on the above analysis, staff recommends_ that Alternative. <br />Two, as amended to designate Mr. Smith's property as single-family <br />residential (up to 6 units/acre), be adopted as a revision to the <br />existing Winter Beach Precise Land Use Map. <br />39 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.