My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7/29/1986
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1986
>
7/29/1986
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:53:03 AM
Creation date
6/12/2015 12:46:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
07/29/1986
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
49
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
JUL 2 9 1936 <br />BOOK 6 5 FAZE ?40 <br />Transportation System <br />All of the parcels of land located in the vicinity of the <br />I-95/C.R. 512 Commercial/ Industrial node have either primary of <br />secondary access to County Road 512A designated as an arterial on <br />the Thoroughfare Plan). The existing interchange at County Road' <br />512 and I-95 provides access to the major north -south <br />transportation system for the State of Florida. <br />RECOMMENDATION <br />Although the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended that the <br />node be increased to 1000 acres, the staff, based on the above <br />analysis, recommends that the C.R. 512/I-95 Commercial/Industrial <br />node be enlarged from 240 to 400 acres. The staff feels that the <br />proposed 400 acre node will fulfill the commercial and industrial <br />needs of this area throughout the twenty-year life of the <br />comprehensive plan based on the limited amount of existing <br />commercial and industrial development in this area. <br />Attorney Michael O'Haire inquired if staff is still <br />recommending enlarging the node to 400 acres rather than 1000, <br />and this was confirmed by Planner Shearer. <br />Commissioner Bird did not believe we are getting into de- <br />lineating the boundaries at this time, and it was agreed that we <br />are not to that point. <br />Attorney George Glenn came before the Board representing <br />Edmund Ansin and made suggestions as set out in the following <br />letter: <br />18 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.