My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8/6/1986
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1986
>
8/6/1986
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:53:03 AM
Creation date
6/12/2015 12:48:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
08/06/1986
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
83
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
AUG 61986 <br />BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS <br />1840 25th Street <br />Vero Beach, Florida 32960 <br />BID TABULATION <br />BID NO.DATE OF OPENING <br />�ues. <br />IRC BID #296 July 22, 198 <br />BID TITLE <br />CONCRETE STRAIN POLES <br />BOOK 65 PA,E?87 <br />ITEM DESCRIPTION I UNIT PRICEI UNIT PRICEI UNIT PRICEI UNIT PRICEI UNIT PF <br />NO. <br />1. CQl1Cl��e__$_tra_L <br />641-14-38 2 Each 2610 00 2015_ 00 2041 00 1777 100 <br />Ea. Ea. Ea. Ea. I <br />4030 l o0 4082 1001 3554 100 <br />I. AT&T Weather Service Contract <br />The Board reviewed memos of Assistant County Attorney Wilson <br />and from the Director of Emergency Management: <br />TO: The Board of County Commissioners <br />DATE: July 30, 1986 (amended August 5, 1986) <br />SUBJECT:Weather Service Contract <br />FROM: Wilson <br />9s,sstant County Attorney <br />The above -referenced contract has been previously considered <br />by the Board and rejected due to the fact that AT&T had not <br />signed the agreement. I contacted James Metcalf of AT&T to <br />ascertain why the contract was not signed prior to delivery <br />and Mr. Metcalf informed me that AT&T has a policy of not <br />signing these contracts until all other parties sign. <br />This matter has been placed on the agenda for your <br />reconsideration to determine whether the .Board will accept <br />and sign the contract under the terms stated by AT&T, or <br />reject this contract in its entirety. Doug Wright, Director <br />of Emergency Management, will be present at the Board <br />meeting to explain the purpose and need for this equipment. <br />The County could suffer no adverse legal consequences by <br />authorizing the Chairman to sign the above -referenced <br />contract prior to execution by AT&T's officers. Therefore, <br />it is my recommendation that the Board of County <br />Commissioners authorize the Chairman to execute this <br />contract and return the contract to AT&T for their approval, <br />provided, of course, that the Board approves the purchase of <br />the equipment specified. <br />16 <br />O <br />� <br />O <br />4 <br />c <br />� ,ate <br />•+�, <br />0 <br />ITEM DESCRIPTION I UNIT PRICEI UNIT PRICEI UNIT PRICEI UNIT PRICEI UNIT PF <br />NO. <br />1. CQl1Cl��e__$_tra_L <br />641-14-38 2 Each 2610 00 2015_ 00 2041 00 1777 100 <br />Ea. Ea. Ea. Ea. I <br />4030 l o0 4082 1001 3554 100 <br />I. AT&T Weather Service Contract <br />The Board reviewed memos of Assistant County Attorney Wilson <br />and from the Director of Emergency Management: <br />TO: The Board of County Commissioners <br />DATE: July 30, 1986 (amended August 5, 1986) <br />SUBJECT:Weather Service Contract <br />FROM: Wilson <br />9s,sstant County Attorney <br />The above -referenced contract has been previously considered <br />by the Board and rejected due to the fact that AT&T had not <br />signed the agreement. I contacted James Metcalf of AT&T to <br />ascertain why the contract was not signed prior to delivery <br />and Mr. Metcalf informed me that AT&T has a policy of not <br />signing these contracts until all other parties sign. <br />This matter has been placed on the agenda for your <br />reconsideration to determine whether the .Board will accept <br />and sign the contract under the terms stated by AT&T, or <br />reject this contract in its entirety. Doug Wright, Director <br />of Emergency Management, will be present at the Board <br />meeting to explain the purpose and need for this equipment. <br />The County could suffer no adverse legal consequences by <br />authorizing the Chairman to sign the above -referenced <br />contract prior to execution by AT&T's officers. Therefore, <br />it is my recommendation that the Board of County <br />Commissioners authorize the Chairman to execute this <br />contract and return the contract to AT&T for their approval, <br />provided, of course, that the Board approves the purchase of <br />the equipment specified. <br />16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.