8/20/1986 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

put any more structures in that right-of-way. BOOK 65 FA -E457 If he didn't have a structure there now, without this ordinance he would be required to dedicate, but with this ordinance, he would be required to reserve the right-of-way. Commissioner Bird was concerned whether the County was being fair to the property owner by encumbering his property when we may or may not use it in the future. Chairman Scurlock felt the key is that we are going to need this right-of-way at some time point in time. Attorney Vitunac advised that while the developer can't put required site plan improvements in that specific area, he can make use of this property to some extent and can even put buildings in it if he agrees he will take them down later without cost to the«county. Director Keating advised that staff has worked to structure the reservation agreement so the boundary of the reservation area would constitute the property line boundary for purposes of determining setbacks. Chairman Scurlock felt this would allow a business decision to be made based on our existing Thoroughfare Plan as you could project over 5-7-10 years, etc., and decide whether it would be beneficial to proceed. Commissioner Lyons wished to know how a minor site plan differs from an amendment to an existing site plan. It was explained that there are two categories of site plans, major and minor, and minor would involve property of less than 5,000 sq, ft. x Director Keating noted that major and minor site plans can be either submittals or amendments, but administrative approvals can only be to an existing site plan. The way the ordinance reads now, staff can't authorize any changes which change the impervious surface, and he felt the proposed change would speed things up. The Chairman asked if anyone present wished to be heard. 30