Laserfiche WebLink
AUG 2 0 eJ <br />BOOK 5 u F 7 - <br />A rezoning to a commercial zoning district would only eliminate <br />the nonconforming use of the property and all of the other non - <br />conformities would remain. The significance of 'the numerous <br />nonconforming aspects of the property is that a site plan could <br />never be approved unless all site related nonconformities were <br />eliminated. Therefore, rezoning along is, not a viable option for <br />the use of the property. <br />Residential use, in conformance with RM -10 zoning standards is a <br />more viable option. Due to minimum land area requirements of <br />10,000 square feet for two dwelling units, only one dwelling unit <br />could be established on the property (total land area is 8,479 sq. <br />ft.). Residential use of the structure would bring the use into <br />conformance with RM -10 zoning and site improvements such as the <br />provision of only two off street parking spaces (as opposed to <br />five spaces for retail use) would permit an easier conversion to <br />residential use than commercial use. <br />Staff is unable to identift, any viable option other than conver- <br />sion of the existing st_:_ ��;.._ to residential use. Any amendment <br />to the zoning ordinance to permit the reestablishment of a non- <br />conforming use to the extent necessary to provide for reestab- <br />lishment of this particular grocery store would (in effect) <br />nullify any mechanism to guarantee that eventually, over usually <br />long periods of time, uses and structures will convert to uses <br />conforming to the zoning ordinance. <br />RECOMMENDATION <br />Staff recommends that the request to consider reestablishment of a <br />nonconforming use be denied based on the above analysis and Mr. <br />Saffold be encouraged to assess how the property could be used in <br />a residential manner <br />Chairman Scurlock believed this structure was built before <br />we even had zoning in -the County and operated for many years as a <br />grocery store. Then it became in such disrepair, it needed a new <br />roof, and because of financial problems, it has been vacant for <br />five years. <br />Commissioner Bird noted we have a lot of MXD in this area <br />and wondered if any part of the area is predominantly commercial. <br />44 <br />CURRENT NONCONFORMING <br />ASPECTS OF SITE (continued) <br />Improvement <br />Ccnforming Nonconforming <br />- Height <br />X <br />Coverage <br />X <br />Specific Lot, <br />Structure, or <br />Use <br />X <br />Lot Width <br />X <br />Parking Spaces <br />X <br />Paving <br />X <br />Drainage <br />X <br />Landscaping <br />X <br />Screening <br />X <br />A rezoning to a commercial zoning district would only eliminate <br />the nonconforming use of the property and all of the other non - <br />conformities would remain. The significance of 'the numerous <br />nonconforming aspects of the property is that a site plan could <br />never be approved unless all site related nonconformities were <br />eliminated. Therefore, rezoning along is, not a viable option for <br />the use of the property. <br />Residential use, in conformance with RM -10 zoning standards is a <br />more viable option. Due to minimum land area requirements of <br />10,000 square feet for two dwelling units, only one dwelling unit <br />could be established on the property (total land area is 8,479 sq. <br />ft.). Residential use of the structure would bring the use into <br />conformance with RM -10 zoning and site improvements such as the <br />provision of only two off street parking spaces (as opposed to <br />five spaces for retail use) would permit an easier conversion to <br />residential use than commercial use. <br />Staff is unable to identift, any viable option other than conver- <br />sion of the existing st_:_ ��;.._ to residential use. Any amendment <br />to the zoning ordinance to permit the reestablishment of a non- <br />conforming use to the extent necessary to provide for reestab- <br />lishment of this particular grocery store would (in effect) <br />nullify any mechanism to guarantee that eventually, over usually <br />long periods of time, uses and structures will convert to uses <br />conforming to the zoning ordinance. <br />RECOMMENDATION <br />Staff recommends that the request to consider reestablishment of a <br />nonconforming use be denied based on the above analysis and Mr. <br />Saffold be encouraged to assess how the property could be used in <br />a residential manner <br />Chairman Scurlock believed this structure was built before <br />we even had zoning in -the County and operated for many years as a <br />grocery store. Then it became in such disrepair, it needed a new <br />roof, and because of financial problems, it has been vacant for <br />five years. <br />Commissioner Bird noted we have a lot of MXD in this area <br />and wondered if any part of the area is predominantly commercial. <br />44 <br />