9/3/1986 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

basis and is the same charge as last year or $15.00 per parcel/acre. Rollback does not apply per parcel/acre. He advised that he would next address the various Street Lighting Districts which also are assessed on a per parcel/acre basis and rollback does not apply. Director Baird then announced the proposed assessments and budgets for the following Street Lighting Districts: Rockridge Street Lighting District - the same as last year at $5.00 per Parcel/Acre and a proposed budget of $4,023. Laurelwood Street Lighting District - remaining the same at $23.00 per Parcel/Acre and a proposed budget of $9,250. Vero Highlands Street Lighting District - a proposed assessment of $12.50 per Parcel/Acre, down from $25.00 per Parcel/Acre last year, with a proposed budget of $55,007. Gifford Street Lighting District - a proposed assessment of- $9.00 per Parcel/Acre, down from $12;00 per Parcel/Acre last year, with a proposed budget of $64,100. Porpoise Point Lights - Director Baird advised that they will only have a contribution, not a per parcel charge, and the proposed budget is $1,600. Single Light Districts - also not on the tax rolls -yet and will not have a per parcel charge. The proposed budget is $1,850. Laurel Court Street Lighting District - also not on the tax rolls this year and will not have a per parcel charge. The proposed budget is $774. Chairman Scurlock inquired if the Board members had any further questions on these items at this time before he opened the public hearing on the items just reviewed by the OMB Director. Commissioner Wodtke noted that he had thought the Sheriff's budget was up 1.2 Million not 1.3, and Director Baird explained that we pay his Workmen's Comp. The Board allowed him to go up 1.2 million, and when staff reviewed his figures, we were $90,000 11 � Bou 65 rn_ 6-Ul