My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9/9/1986
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1986
>
9/9/1986
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:53:19 AM
Creation date
6/12/2015 12:56:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
09/09/1986
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
51
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
SEP <br />9 1986 <br />BOOK 65 <br />FmU-t <br />Attorney Albrecht <br />agreed that can be done, but believed <br />the <br />need is obvious. <br />The Chairman believed that when the Sheriff moves out of the <br />Courthouse Annex into his new complex, it was part of the plan <br />for that part of the Annex to become available for another <br />courtroom. In the long range he felt we eventually will have a <br />criminal justice complex and then possibly the old facilities <br />could be used for County Court. <br />Attorney Vitunac advised Attorney Albrecht that in order to <br />respond to Judge Smith, he needs to know if the Judge is <br />abandoning his request for reimbursement. <br />Attorney Albrecht stated that he would have to talk to the <br />Judge directly about that. He believed what the Judges basically <br />want is to direct those funds from now on specifically to the <br />Judges' own court facilities, and they would like to be able to <br />retain an architect start drawing plans for the new courtroom. <br />Question arose re the amount in the fund now, and Director <br />Baird stated approximately $70,000. Attorney Vitunac advised <br />that he needs the Commission to deny the request for reimburse- <br />ment formally, and that is what he would recommend as he felt the <br />expenditures made from the fund were legal. He also needs to <br />know if they wish the Judges to sign off on expenses out of this <br />_.fund in advance. Board members indicated that they did not. <br />OMB Director Baird reminded the Board that in the next <br />year's budget, we already have authorized expenditures from this <br />fund for an atomic recorder for the Clerk for use in the court <br />and for additional CRTs in the courtroom. <br />Commissioner Bird suggested that we move ahead and deny the <br />request for reimbursement and state as diplomatically as we can <br />that we will continue to make the decisions and interpret the <br />ordinance as to how these funds are expended, but agree we will <br />proceed with the initial steps of planning an additional <br />courtroom with the funds to be expended out of the Court <br />Facilities Fund. <br />30 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.