Laserfiche WebLink
4 <br />BOOK 65 Fr+;i.7 9 <br />Z 3— A <br />Sheriffs Administration Cost Estimate <br />ITEM NO. <br />DESCRIPTION <br />AMOUNT <br />1.0 <br />CONCRETE <br />$ 494,010 <br />2.0 <br />ROOFING <br />138,930 <br />-3.0 <br />SITEWORK/FILL <br />219,880 <br />4.0 <br />GLASS & DOORS <br />55,440 <br />5.0 , <br />FINISHES <br />136,950 <br />6.0 <br />PARTITIONS <br />82,500 <br />7.0 <br />GENERAL CONTRACTOR <br />165,000 <br />- 8.0 <br />PLUMBING125,500 <br />9.0 <br />ELECTRIC <br />152,000 <br />X10.0 <br />HVAC <br />135,500 <br />11.0 <br />INSULATION <br />1,980 <br />12.0 <br />LANDSCAPING <br />39,930 <br />13.0 <br />IRRIGATION <br />14,850 <br />14.0 <br />GENERAL CONDITIONS <br />158,600 <br />15.0 <br />EQUIPMENT SPECIAL CONDITIONS <br />77,090 <br />SUBTOTAL 1,993,160 <br />5% CONTINGENCIES 99,908 <br />SUBTOTAL $2.098,068 <br />I <br />MAINTENANCE SHOP BUILDING 70,875 <br />CONFISCATED PROPERTY STRUCTURE 323,098 <br />TOTAL $2,492,041 <br />Architect Charles Block compared the construction bids with <br />respect to Base Bids and Alternates #1 (Storage Building) and #2 <br />(Sales Tax). <br />Chairman Scurlock understood that the low bidder on the base <br />bid plus Alternates #1 and #2 was P.W.R. Corporation with <br />$2,107,000, and Mr. Block stated that basically their <br />recommendation is to look at it from the base bid, since they did <br />not know how the Commission wanted to address the two alternates. <br />t <br />26 <br />