Laserfiche WebLink
****PRELIMINARY AND TENTATIVE FINDINGS**** <br />pay operating, debt service, and other specified costs. The Board and the Executive Committee are responsible for <br />approving the rate structures for the non -ARP and ARP projects, respectively. <br />The majority of financial activity occurs in the ARP, in which the FMPA is responsible for providing all electricity <br />needs for the ARP members that are not provided by other FMPA projects. In contrast, the other projects have less <br />financial activity, as these projects represent minority ownership in joint electricity projects with other power <br />providers. Revenues and expenses for the various projects for the 2012-13 fiscal year, the most recent audited <br />information available as of December 2014, were as noted in Table 2 (amounts reported in thousands): <br />Table 2 <br />Description <br />All St. Lucie Stanton Stanton II Tri -City Agency <br />Requirements Project Project Project Project Fund (1) <br />Project <br />Operating Revenue $ 481,573 $ 46,230 $ 23,260 $ 51,003 $ 9,122 $ 12,531 <br />Operating Expenses 431,660 44,771 16,539 36,064 6,477 12,718 <br />Nonoperating Net Expense 8,276 11,277 3,102 7,342 1,429 11 <br />Note (1): The Agency Fund is not associated with a particular project railer, it accounts for general operations benefiting all <br />projects. <br />Source: 17VMP:1 2012-13 fiscal year audited financial statements <br />FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS <br />The FMPA was created pursuant to interlocal agreements among several municipalities. Although the FMPA is a <br />governmental entity, many of the laws applicable to local governments, including municipalities, do not apply to the <br />FMPA. Further, unlike investor owned utilities (IOUs), the FMPA is not subject to any rate -setting authority by the <br />Florida Public Service Commission, which is consistent with JAAs in other states. As noted in the Background <br />section, oversight of the FMPA's activities is provided by the Board composed of member municipalities for <br />non -ARP projects and by an Executive Committee for the ARP project. <br />Table No. 3 shows comparative monthly residential service bills for the 2013 calendar year for IOUs, non-FMPA <br />member municipal electrical utilities, FMPA ARP members, and FMPA non -ARP members. The FMPA ARP <br />members' weighted average monthly bills are greater than the weighted average IOU bills and weighted average <br />non-FMPA member municipal electric utilities' monthly bills by $7.12 (6 percent), and $4.09 (3 percent), respectively. <br />Additionally, the weighted average bill for an FMPA ARP member is higher than the weighted average bill for an <br />FMPA non -ARP member by $4.81, or 4 percent. There are multiple factors that impact FMPA ARP members' <br />residential rates, some of which are not attributable to FMPA, including: <br />Y Several ARP members also participate in non -ARP projects. Consequently, the ARP member receives power <br />from multiple sources at differing wholesale rates, which are factored into customer billings. <br />Y ARP members add additional costs, such as electrical service costs associated with delivery of power, to <br />customer billings. <br />Y According to Moody's Investors Service, "Many FMPA member electric utilities have sizable transfers of <br />electric fund revenues to their municipal General Funds which can sometimes contribute to above average <br />retail rates for some members." <br />4 <br />6 <br />