My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9/23/1986
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1986
>
9/23/1986
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:53:19 AM
Creation date
6/12/2015 1:03:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
09/23/1986
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
file in the Office of Clerk to the Board. Mr, Votapka stated <br />that Rivera Estates is a little community of 72 lots, and they <br />are over 2/3 built out. In 1982 when these conditions really <br />started, the builder had stopped building and turned these lots <br />over to private individuals. Since then some of the lots have <br />been built on, but this particular lot next to his house and the <br />lot diagonally across, they have always had problems with. He <br />emphasized that he has complained to the Planning Department, <br />which sent out a letter, and some lots were cleared, but the one <br />in question hasn't been cleared since May of 1985. <br />Chairman Scurlock asked Attorney Vitunac if it is possible <br />to create an ordinance to deal with this situation so that we <br />don't have to get involved with every vacant lot in the county, <br />and Attorney Vitunac agreed that the problem right now is that <br />the county is so rural and there are many platted subdivisions <br />where no one has built and there are -not even any streets. He <br />did feel, however, an ordinance could be designed that if a <br />subdivision were, for instance, 75% inhabited or built out, a <br />provision to deal with this problem would kick in. <br />Assistant County Attorney Wilson advised that he has a draft <br />of an ordinance he feels would adequately cover subdivisions <br />which are close to build -out, and he would like to include two <br />remedies in it - the first would be to take it through the Code <br />Enforcement Board, and in cases where that may not be sufficient, <br />then he would like to be able to bring it before the County <br />Commission. <br />Commissioner Bird felt we already had such an ordinance, and <br />noted there was a newspaper article dated 1983 quoting from such <br />an ordinance. <br />Planning Director Keating advised that we do not have such <br />an ordinance; however, he believed we may have had such an <br />ordinance in 1983, which was repealed. <br />15 <br />SEP 2 3 1986 <br />BOOK 65- FADE 815 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.