My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10/14/1986
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1986
>
10/14/1986
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:53:20 AM
Creation date
6/12/2015 1:09:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
10/14/1986
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
86
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
about mid way on Lot 2, but the road paving will serve Lots 2 and <br />3, and even though Mr. Gough is not being assessed for Lot 1, he <br />will benefit from a paved road all the way ,to U.S. #1. Lots 4 <br />and 5 are being assessed $1425 each. <br />Commissioner Lyons asked what happens to the other <br />assessments if we reduce Mr. Gough's assessment, and Director <br />Davis said that the difference would be divided into the other <br />assessments, unless the County decided to subsidize it. He <br />suggested that we assess Mr. Gough for only 1# lots instead of 2, <br />which would result in a difference of $700. <br />Mr. Gough advised that he just heard this morning that 78th <br />Avenue was to be paved also, and believed the Sandrift Motel <br />would be the only one to benefit from the paving of that road. <br />The motel is directly in back of his home and they have big <br />diesel trucks parked in back of the motel. <br />Commissioner Lyons wondered if the motel should stand the <br />expense of paving 78th Avenue. <br />Director Davis explained that the north line of Lot 4 is <br />where the motel is, and Lots 4, 5, 6 and 7 are being assessed. <br />Freida—Brown, 14395 80th Avenue, pointed out that 78th <br />Avenue is only being used by the motel, an auto parts store, a <br />service station, and a bowling alley, and she felt the County <br />should assess those businesses only. She also noted that there <br />are several widows living on the street and this assessment is a <br />hardship on them. <br />Commissioner Bowman suggested that the widows use the <br />installment plan that is available. <br />Mr. Gough could not understand why he was being assessed for <br />1z lots when only 100 feet is being paved and 100 feet is the <br />equivalent of one lot. <br />Commissioner Wodtke felt the difference is that the road <br />will. serve Lots 1, 2, and 3, but Mr, stressed that another party <br />own s pa r t o f -Lo t T. <br />37 <br />OCT 14 1166 Bou 66 uu 37 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.