10/28/1986 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

OCT 2 8 1986 BOOK 66 U'u,F 1� Commissioner Wodtke asked if this applies only in platted subdivisions and not those divided by metes and bounds, and he also wished -to know who pays all the costs that would be involved in the splitting of lots. Planner Boling advised that metes and bounds properties would not be included and the applicant would pay for the costs involved, advertising, etc., according to our fee schedule. Chairman Scurlock asked if the Board members had any questions on the eight amendments. Commissioner Wodkte wanted an example of the amendment pro- posed in Section 3, and Planner Boling referred to Mr. Lawhon's Oslo Ridge Subdivision which came before the Board a while back where they utilized the petition paving process to pave 11th Lane SW because some of their lots were fronting on it. That demon- strates where it has been a policy of this Board to do this for the last several years, and this would just include it in the ordinance. Commissioner Bird questioned how Section 5 changes our current situation, and Planner Boling explained that it simply will codify our policy and put developers on notice that certifi- cates of occupancy will not be issued before the required subdivision improvements are completed. Commissioner Wodtke asked if staff is saying the entire thing has to be done or is there some flexibility, and Planner Boling advised that developers are able to do their project in phases. Commissioner Lyons had questions on Section 6 relating to required road widths as he wondered how wide roads should be in some developments, how wide we have to pave, and whether this is narrow enough as some of these roads get hardly any use. Planner Boling referred to the following table on page 8 of the proposed ordinance and advised that staff did have a request to add a footnote: 30