Laserfiche WebLink
OCT 2 8 1986 66 u'u,259 <br />area, and he is asking that the county either go the assessment <br />route or waive it altogether. <br />Board members felt this is a premature discussion. - <br />Mr. Mensing continued to emphasize that assuming the <br />application were in, he does not want to be the one to cause any <br />change in the status of this road out of courtesy to the <br />neighbors. He wants the ball in the Board's court if this is not <br />going to be a dirt road. <br />Commissioner Bird pointed out the Board is not telling Mr. <br />Mensing he has to subdivide, but if he does, that triggers the <br />paving of the road; this puts the burden on the Board; and if <br />that triggers a mandatory assessment, so be it. <br />Mr. Mensing agreed that he will talk to Mr. Balczun about <br />the last issue in his letter, but he did want the Board members _ <br />to know that since it has become known that he has taken cause <br />with this, he has returned $3,200 worth of checks that builders <br />and developers in the county have sent him to engage an attorney <br />to proceed with this becauso they are tired of feeling that they <br />have an adversary in the Planning Department rather than an <br />informative agency. <br />Chairman Scurlock asked if Mr. Mensing has submitted a <br />formal complaint in writing in*terms of charging Mr. Keating and <br />the Planning staff, because -he felt if Mr. Mensing is really is <br />going to push this, it should be spelled out in black and white <br />and the Board will address the charges. He cautioned Mr. Mensing <br />that if it turns out that the charges he makes are frivolous then <br />Director Keating and staff have the legal ability to defend <br />themselves. <br />ANNUAL COOPERATIVE FORESTRY ASSISTANCE REPORT <br />ON MOTION by Commissioner Wodtke, SECONDED by Com- <br />missioner Lyons, the Board unanimously accepted the <br />Annual Cooperative Forestry Assistance Report, City <br />59 <br />