My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11/4/1986
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1986
>
11/4/1986
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:53:20 AM
Creation date
6/12/2015 1:13:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
11/04/1986
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
56
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
NOV 41986 BOOK ��' F,�'U-C 312 <br />Chairman Scurlock asked if Mr. Koolage, a former member of <br />the Hospital Board, felt the hospital could function at 35' and <br />whether he would advocate that hospitals be allowed to build up - <br />higher. <br />Mr. Koolage believed it would require a hospital architect <br />to answer that but noted that hospitals, in general, have gone <br />up. He did not feel the hospital is a good comparison. <br />Chairman Scurlock pointed out that since the hospital was <br />granted the height exception in the late 70's, no other building <br />has been granted that exception; so he did not feel it opened the <br />flood gates. He inquired if Mr. Koolage realized the net effect <br />of this change would be 5' and not 10, and Mr. Koolage stated <br />that he did not want to see a break in.what is established. <br />Frank Kahn, resident and senior citizen, st@ted that—he <br />believes in controlled growth. The hospital needs more growth, <br />and he did not want to stymie progress. He believed there are <br />experienced people on the Commission who are good at controlling <br />growth, on a case by case basis if necessary, and urged the Board <br />to look to the future and move the buildings back as far as they <br />legally can. <br />Commissioner Wodtke commented that he has been on the Com- <br />mission many years and does not want to go above 351, but he is <br />concerned about erosion and.vegetation and would like to get the <br />building back 30' if we can. He stressed that we are locked in <br />on an approved site plan where Mr. Nutt can build right up to the <br />coastal construction line with more units, and felt we are faced <br />with a dilemma. <br />Chairman Scurlock asked Attorney Stewart if the ordinance <br />were to be modified to 1' of height for 11' of setback, what <br />impact that would have on their site plan, and Mr. Stewart stated <br />that if the height was capped at 7' as opposed to 101, they could <br />live with that. <br />Commissioner Lyons personally believed from an environmental <br />standpoint we are going to save vegetation on the dune if we can <br />-. <br />30 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.