Laserfiche WebLink
NOV 18 <br />1966 <br />BOOK 66 F,�cr 408 <br />ITEM <br /># DESCRIPTION <br />QUANTITY <br />UNIT COST <br />TOTAL COST <br />1. <br />8" PVC C-900 <br />2,780 <br />L.F. <br />$14.45/FT <br />$40,171.00 <br />2. <br />8" D.I.P. <br />160 <br />L.F. <br />18.45/FT <br />2,952.00 <br />3. <br />6x6 TAPPING SLEEVE <br />2 <br />EACH <br />900.00 EA <br />1,800.00 <br />_ 4. <br />6" D.I.P. CL51 <br />20 <br />L.F. <br />9.65/FT <br />193.00 <br />5. <br />PAVEMENT RESTORATION <br />670 <br />SQ.YDS. <br />17.00/YD <br />11,390.00 <br />6. <br />SEED & MULCH <br />3,000 <br />SQ.YDS. <br />.40/YD <br />1,200.00 <br />7. <br />JACK & BORE (OS#1) <br />1 <br />EA L.S. <br />12,916.00 <br />8. <br />MOBILIZATION, INSURANCE, <br />MISCELLANEOUS COSTS OF <br />CONTRACTING- <br />2,500.00 <br />TOTAL PROJECT COST: <br />$7.00 <br />X73 �- -`oa <br />RECOMMENDATION 73, "QQ'00 <br />Utility Staff recommends to the Boardf County Commissioners that <br />they waive the bidding procedures and and the contract to Coastline <br />Utilities, Inc. in the amount of for the sewer project at <br />12th Street and Commerce Avenue for the following reasons: <br />1) the time associated with the bid process to start this project; <br />2) the pricing is based on unit pricing of just -completed utility <br />projects by Indian River County; <br />3) the contractor is working on other water projects for the <br />Utilities Division within a two -block area and mobilization <br />costs are substantially reduced; <br />4) the overall costs negotiated by Staff are in the best interest <br />of the utility customer. <br />Chairman Scurlock's only question related to the bidding <br />procedure, and Director Pinto explained that one of the problems <br />they are running into is that we already have three contractors <br />working in this same area, and staff felt it would be a terrible <br />problem to add another contractor into this project. Also this <br />contractor was the contractor for Route 60, and he indicated he <br />would be willing to use his same unit costs out of the Route 60 <br />project. Since those were for a much larger scale project„ <br />Director Pinto felt these are very good prices. <br />Chairman Scurlock noted that, in other words, the prime <br />motivation is that staff feels we have good unit prices, and <br />secondly, we don'.t want to bring an additional contractor on this <br />job. Director Pinto said that was exactly it. <br />43 <br />