My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12/2/1986
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1986
>
12/2/1986
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:53:20 AM
Creation date
6/12/2015 1:18:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
12/02/1986
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
was $8,500. The County Administrator and the Beach Preservation a�d <br />Restoration Committee inqpired as to whether the County survey crews could <br />perform the survey work and the --,.by save the County $8,500. It was <br />determined that this work could be perfoxpied by County crews. <br />Later, the Board and staff decided to exr..and the scope of work to include <br />the entire barrier island north of CR 510, as well as Round Island Park. <br />This basically doubled the scope of work and necessary survey work to <br />approximately $17,000 of in -field survey. The mapping contract with Abrams <br />was approximately $50,285. <br />Usually, aerial control points are First -orated in the field and targeted <br />prior to flying the photography. However, Abrams decided to fly the aerial <br />Photography first, then select control points to be located in the field <br />from photo identifiable points. <br />Mien the photos were given to our survey crews, sane points, such as real <br />estate signs, trees, etc., were relocated or removed after the photography <br />was flown. The survey crews could not fid these points. There were also <br />sane points which the survey crews rade minor computational errors. <br />The County's Contract with Abrams does not contain language which covers <br />this situation, does not contain a tire of completion, nor liquidated <br />damages. <br />ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS <br />Staff and Abrams have discussed this request for additional c mT)ensation. <br />Basically, both parties are sansuhat guilty for lack of early ccnmmni- <br />cation. The Public Works Departre^t did not participate in negotiating the <br />contract nor did we get to review it prior to execution. <br />RECOMMENDATION AND FUNDING <br />It is reccnriended that the Board authorize additional cagmnsation in the <br />amount of $2,623 (50% of that requested) to cover the alleged control <br />problems. Funding to be transferred from Federal Revenue Sharing <br />Contingency (102-199-581-099.91) to 102-11-0-515-033.19. ` <br />Commissioner Wheeler was curious about transferring of funds <br />from last year's budget to this year to pay Cubit Engineering and <br />Abrams Aerial as he had felt all this was to be completed in <br />September. He wondered why the project has been running so far <br />behind. <br />Public Works Director Davis noted that he did know that much <br />about the funding of the project, but as far as the scheduling <br />was concerned, there were some items that delayed the photo- <br />grammetry to be done by Abrams Aerial, which, in turn, delayed <br />Cubit Engineering. <br />Commissioner Wheeler did not have a problem about <br />transferring the funds, but wished to make sure the funds aren't <br />dispensed until both of these items have been addressed. <br />7 <br />IEC 2 1986 <br />L� CC. <br />BOOK <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.