Laserfiche WebLink
F-7- - <br />E G 2 <br />,- <br />BOOK 66 750 <br />L. IRC Bid #321,_ Fire_Extinguisher Inspection & Servicing <br />(Annual Bid) <br />The Board reviewed the following memo dated 12/8/86: <br />TO: Board of County Commissioners DATE: Dec. 8, 1936 FILE: <br />(7�1) <br />THRU: Joseph. aird SUBJECT: IRC Bid #321 -Fire Extinguisher <br />Director, Budget Office Inspection & Servicing (Annual Bid) <br />FROMZ�2-,O��&�REFERENCE <br />Caroly .poodrich, Manager `S' <br />Purcha v ng Department <br />1. Description and Conditions <br />Bids were received Thursday, October 30, 1986 att11:00 A.M. <br />for Fire Extinguishers Maintenance and Servicing. <br />5 Bid Proposals were sent out, 5 Bids were received. <br />2. Alternatives and Analysis <br />Per the attached memo from Lynn Williams, based on the size, <br />type and number of extinguishers in the County, the lower <br />overall bid would be All American Fire and Safety, Vero Beach, F1. <br />3. Recommendation and Funding <br />Staff recommends that IRC #321 be awarded to All American Fire <br />and Safety. <br />__Funds are budgeted in Account #001-220-519-033.49. <br />Chairman Scurlock explained that he requested that this item <br />be removed from the Consent Agenda for discussion because an <br />individual in the audience wished to be heard. <br />Chris Prewitt of American Safety Products of the Treasure <br />Coast emphasized that.although the annual fire extinguisher bids <br />were sent out twice, they still do not meet the fire standards. <br />He stressed that no brand name was used for the powder used in <br />refueling and they were the only firm that specified "new <br />powder." Mr. Prewitt urged the Board to review this bid before <br />it is awarded, because he felt there were some real problems <br />here. <br />23 <br />