Laserfiche WebLink
JAN 1�, �2 <br />DESCRIPTION & CONDITIONS <br />BOCK 66 PviF 930 <br />The Planning Department has prepared a proposed amendment to the <br />zoning ordinance which would create a professional office zoning <br />district which could be located in selected residential areas. <br />On January 9, 1985, the Board of County Commissioners and Plan- <br />ning and Zoning Commission held a joint workshop to discuss the <br />possibility of allowing offices as a special exception use in a <br />few multiple -family zoning districts. The general consensus of <br />individuals at the workshop was that the County should permit <br />offices as a special exception use -in multiple -family districts <br />abutting arterial streets. Moreover, some individuals felt that <br />offices should also be allowed as a special exception use in <br />single-family zoning districts that abutted arterial streets and <br />there was discussion about allowing offices along collector <br />streets and permitting accessory retail sales in conjunction with <br />some of these offices. <br />On July 24, 1985, the Board of County Commissioners decided not <br />to amend the RM -6, RM -8 and RM -10 multiple -family zoning dis- <br />tricts to allow offices as a special exception use on properties <br />abutting an arterial street. The Board stated that the proposed <br />amendment was too broad and would allow offices along State Road <br />A -1-A which they did not feel was appropriate. The Board in- <br />structed the staff to look at this situation again and prepare <br />another proposal that would be more restrictive. In addition, <br />the Board wanted to know specific areas where this type of <br />development would be permitted. <br />On January 23, 1986, the Planning and Zoning Commission con- <br />sidered two alternatives and voted 4 -to -0 to recommend that the <br />County allow professional offices in some residentially zoned <br />areas along arterial streets and that this be implemented through <br />the creation of a professional office zoning district. <br />On February 26, 1986, the Board of County Commissioners tabled <br />action on this item until the Planning Department could provide <br />maps of the areas which might be considered for professional <br />office development. <br />On May 14, 1986, the Board of County Commissioners considered <br />this issue again and authorized the staff to schedule public <br />hearings on the proposed new professional office zoning district. <br />On June 26, 1986, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted 3 -to -0 <br />to recommend approval of a professional office zoning district. <br />At the public hearing, the planning staff recommended that Health <br />Services, which would include doctor's offices, be removed from <br />the proposed new zoning district because this type of use <br />generates a large amount of traffic which would be inconsistent <br />with the intent of the district. However, the Planning and <br />Zoning Commission felt that Health Services should be included in <br />this district. <br />On July 23, 1986, the Board of County Commissioners tabled action <br />on the proposed professional office zoning district. The Board <br />indicated that they felt such a district should be utilized for <br />redevelopment areas. and expressed concerns about the potential <br />for spot zoning and encouraging strip commercial. development - <br />through adoption of this zoning district. <br />On December 11, 1986, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted <br />4 7 -to -0 to recommend approval of the PRO district with health <br />services added as a special exception use. <br />82 <br />