My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1/13/1987
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1987
>
1/13/1987
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:59:17 AM
Creation date
6/12/2015 1:26:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
01/13/1987
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
109
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I <br />®6 <br />BOOK 66 f,4,U '. 13 <br />establishing some of these zoning districts because he believed <br />it could destroy the character of Indian River County. <br />John Schlitt, architect, believed that changes force <br />changes, and that the changes that forced degradation in the case <br />of SR -60 were due to the 4 -lane divided roadway. <br />Frank Zorc, 2100 Vero Beach Avenue, did not believe that a <br />Professional Ottice District would be in the best interests of <br />the county right now. He disagreed that residential is not <br />compatible alongside a 4 -lane road because people purchase brand <br />new housing on 4 -lane roadways. <br />ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by <br />Commissioner Bowman, the Board unanimously closed <br />the Public Hearing. <br />Commissioner Bowman understood that we would be creating <br />only the zoning district today, not the actual areas where it <br />could be applied. <br />MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Bowman, SECONDED by <br />Commissioner Eggert, that the Board adopted Ordinance <br />87-8, amending the Zoning Code by creating a <br />Professional Office Zoning District (PRO), with the <br />exclusion of "medical facilities". <br />Under discussion, Commissioner Wheeler understood that the <br />reason for excluding medical facilities is due to the traffic <br />generated by those type of offices, and Mr. Brenner explained <br />that the position of the P 8 Z Commission was to keep it in as a <br />special exception. <br />THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. the Motion <br />was voted on and carried unanimously. <br />84 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.