My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1/20/1987
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1987
>
1/20/1987
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:59:17 AM
Creation date
6/12/2015 1:34:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
01/20/1987
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
59
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
r--JAN 20 1987 <br />jt f-J <br />their plans, but just feels whatever is put there, great <br />attention must be given to the surrounding property. <br />Commissioner Eggert suggested that we have a joint meeting <br />with the City re a list of items. <br />Commissioner Bowman asked if the City has a Technical Review <br />Committee similar to the County's, and if so, asked why there <br />couldn't be a joint one to consider matters that are of common <br />interest. <br />Attorney Vitunac advised that the City does have a similar <br />committee, and the staff of the two entities do exchange infor- <br />mation. He noted that the County has the option of considering <br />the plan itself and sending over its comments. <br />Chairman Scurlock asked about the County's ability to oppose <br />an annexation, and Attorney Vitunac stated that the only grounds <br />would be if the property were not contiguous or the property <br />owners not amenable to the annexation. <br />Nancy Offutt came before the Board speaking as an individ- <br />ual. She informed the Board that her husband is trustee and <br />owner of a good bit of the property in question, and they have <br />tried to talk to the Rockridge residents re their intent to <br />provide a quality project. Mrs. Offutt advised that the City is <br />doing an annexation study to consider whether it can serve this <br />property with utilities, is.conducting traffic counts, etc. The <br />annexation and zoning will be separate issues, but they will be <br />almost concurrent. Mrs. Offutt explained that the sequence of <br />events is being followed as it is because of the need to plan <br />ahead. If the County has concerns, or the residents, she felt <br />they should attend the public hearings, present their concerns, <br />and argue either for or against the annexation. Mrs. Offutt <br />further advised that the Chairman.of the Library Board has <br />received a letter from the developers stating that they would be <br />happy to have the library as a compatible facility. <br />Fred Mensing, interested citizen, felt the Board needs to <br />present to the Legislative Delegation the need to require that <br />56 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.