My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1/27/1987
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1987
>
1/27/1987
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/6/2018 11:36:22 AM
Creation date
6/12/2015 1:39:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
01/27/1987
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
105
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
the past, the County has required a professional engineer to <br />certify what the flood elevation should be, but now the flood <br />insurance people are recommending that; the County adopt a <br />different set of regulations and set the minimum flood elevation <br />for septic tanks at either 18" above the crown of the road or <br />the elevation established by the Health Department, whichever is <br />higher. <br />Discussion took place on the septic tank elevations, and <br />Commissioner Wheeler felt that some situations just get worse <br />when the new regulations are applied to new houses in areas <br />where there are existing homes. <br />2) Eliminating a standard the county has had for quite a <br />while. Historically, the County's stormwater management <br />ordinance has required anyone building in a flood hazard area to <br />meet not only the elevations set by the Flood Insurance <br />Administration but also go a foot higher. The extra foot may <br />have provided a lot of protection, but it is difficult to <br />determine whether or not it was warranted, and it has created a <br />lot of problems, particularly in older subdivisions. Staff is <br />recommending that the extra foot requirement be eliminated. <br />Public Works Director Jim Davis felt the following sentence <br />under 8(c) on Page 11 of the ordinance should be deleted because <br />it is a little redundant, "Each percolation or retention area <br />shall include positive drainage facilities which provide for <br />drainage to public outfalls or a lake, or water course, to <br />handle the runoff from storms of longer duration and severity." <br />He suggested that the next sentence be labelled as 8(d) and the <br />following sentence as 8(e), and renumber the original 8(d) as <br />8(t). <br />Commissioner Wheeler asked for a definition of "lowest <br />floor" mentioned on Page 16, and Director Davis explained that <br />the "lowest floor" definition has been clarified to exclude <br />basements. A basement should not be a habitable structure when <br />built in a velocity zone. In unnumbered A zones, we don't want <br />76 <br />JAN 2 7 1987 BOOK. 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.