Laserfiche WebLink
AGREEMENT WITH FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH FOR ADDITIONAL COURTHOUSE <br />PARKING <br />The Board reviewed the following letter dated 1/7/87: <br />LAW OFFICES OF <br />RTJACKSNPRpOBEONAL <br />�0�,����L•,�,0�, <br />A SOCIOATION <br />�� <br />SAN 1y87 <br />2165 15TH AVENUE <br />N <br />VERO BEACH, FLORIDA 32960 <br />to C=) <br />In RECIEV ; D C' <br />BOARD ti <br />_ <br />TELEPHONE 567-4355 <br />CEJcommtssloNg-'�1: <br />AREA CODE 305 <br />' <br />!��£6Z$ZLZ9ti4� <br />January 7, 1987 <br />DISTRIBUTION LIST <br />Commissioners 1q. HM. <br />Administrator L/ <br />Mr. Douglas Scurlock, Chairman <br />Attorney <br />Ms. Margaret Bowman, Vice Chairman <br />Personnel <br />Mr. Richard N. Bird <br />Public Works <br />Ms. Carolyn K. Eggert <br />Commurlii:y Dev. <br />Mr. Gary C. Wheeler <br />Utilities <br />Board of County Commissioners <br />Finance <br />Other <br />Re: Proposed utilization of property owned <br />by First Baptist :b"I_my <br />Church for County parking needs of the <br />court house. �J <br />Dear Ladies and Gentlemen: <br />I am a member of a committee at the First Baptist Church which <br />deals -with the use of church property. I was asked by the <br />committee to contact the Board of County Commissioners as to a <br />possible joint use of church property for the mutual benefit of <br />the county and of the church. Recently, I have spoken with Jim <br />Davis, who is familiar with this subject. <br />There is a large vacant area of land behind the church and Sunday <br />school building. This property is located across from the court <br />house north parking lot. This land could possibly alleviate any <br />court house parking problem. Since the church needs parking <br />primarily on Sundays and evenings, the county would have full use <br />of the property during the week. <br />It was the committee's thought that the -county could construct <br />the parking area and the church would agree for use to continue <br />over a period of time to make the arrangement beneficial to the <br />county. If the church would ever decide to build on -'the <br />property, then they could compensate the county for its costs <br />based on the length of the county's use. The church has no plans <br />to uti-lize the area. <br />Your consideration of this idea would be appreciated. It appears <br />that this venture could alleviate a problem for the county <br />without having to buy or condemn any expensive city property. <br />Very truly yours, <br />A <br />�. <br />Robert Jacks <br />90 BOOK 6.6 F'VIJE 15O <br />JAN 7 <br />