My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2/3/1987
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1987
>
2/3/1987
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:59:17 AM
Creation date
6/12/2015 1:42:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
02/03/1987
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
60
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
RECOMMENDATION <br />The outstanding escrow impact fees due total $31,070.00. <br />The staff of the Division of Utility Services requests that the Board <br />of County Commissioners give written notice to the River Run Utility <br />of the deficiencies, hold a public hearing, and levy liquidated <br />damages of no less than fifty dollars ($50.00) per day that said <br />deficiencies exist. <br />Henry Muller, developer of River Run, emphasized that he is <br />not against compliance; he does support reasonable impact fees; <br />and he is paying them now, but his project has gone slowly. Mr. <br />Muller claimed the present situation is one that developed due to <br />an oversight of the Utility Department some time back. He <br />explained that when he applied for a permit to build a clubhouse <br />at River Run, it resulted in the discovery that impact fees were <br />not being collected from any of the developments in accordance <br />with the franchise agreements. He argued that some of these <br />developments like Pelican Pointe, which has hundreds of units, <br />were paying no impact fees whatsoever', and this put River Run, <br />which is much smaller, in an unfair competitive position. <br />Apparently since then they have worked out some agreement, but <br />Mr. Muller argued that because of their size, they were more out <br />of kilter than he was. <br />Mr. Muller stressed that River Run had a prior agreement <br />with the Utility Department which they have lived up to from the <br />beginning. He noted there is only one building in question. <br />This building has 24 units, nine of which have been sold, and it <br />was agreed they would pay the fees for each unit on its closing. <br />This is not in compliance with the terms of the franchise, but <br />this was arranged earlier; they have been living up to that <br />agreement and would like to continue to live up to it on the <br />remaining 13 units. <br />Chairman Scurlock asked why the County should finance Mr. <br />Muller's project, and Mr. Muller stated that the County is not; <br />they now are paying the impact fees in advance on all new <br />construction. <br />31 BOOK 67 <br />11 = i <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.