2/3/1987 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

FEB BOOK The Chairman asked Director Pinto if the Utility Department had an agreement with Mr. Muller as he claims, and Director Pinto noted that the franchise is very.clear and he did not know how the practice of Mr. Muller making payments based on closings got started. He believed a misunderstanding took place between C.O. for the unit and closing on the unit. Director Pinto still felt payment should take place when the unit receives its C.O. and can be occupied rather than when the unit is sold, which is what Mr. Muller is talking about. He further pointed out that it has been a year since all this was brought to light, and staff was directed to straighten it out and give everyone time to get their franchise in order. Everyone who had the problem, except River Run, has either made arrangements to pay or has paid, as set out in the following update: An update for franchises which was taken before the Board of County Commissioners. - FRANCHISE BEG. BALANCE: 1-22-87 BAL: COMMENTS Baytree 41,912.48 -0- Paid in full on 12/15/86 Marsh Island 10,695.62 :' -0- Paid in full on 07/11/86 Pelican Pointe: 415,410.00 209,978.55 : Making bi-monthly : installments of $41,995.71 Reflections 233,762.20 159,672.20 : Negotiating sale of plant : . to the County River Run 31,070.00 31,070.00 : No terms agreed to as of : 12/24/86 Sea Oaks 159,057.08 -0- Paid in full, 7/17/86 Director Pinto advised that Pelican Pointe was the last to come in and make arrangement to make their payments, and they have since paid what they were in arrears. Chairman Scurlock inquired if Pelican Pointe was extended the option of waiting to pay until they sold a unit, and also wished to know why impact fees weren't being monitored as they should have been. Director Pinto stated that no one was extended that option, and in defense of personnel, he felt when you allow someone a franchise to go in business that you should not have to run after 32