My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2/10/1987
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1987
>
2/10/1987
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:59:17 AM
Creation date
6/12/2015 1:42:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
02/10/1987
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
48
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
FEB 10 1937 BOOK U Y uu?61 <br />Scurlock pointed that we still would have to go through an <br />involved process. He believed that while 900 of the people will <br />comply with the restrictions, the other 10% will not, no matter <br />what we do. <br />Robert Keating, Director of Planning & Development, <br />emphasized that the Audubon Society has indicated that they will- <br />assist <br />ily <br />assist by checking for lighting violations during the turtle <br />season. <br />Chairman Scurlock suggested setting up a beachfront survey <br />for the beginning of turtle season, and sending out appropriate <br />notices on violations. <br />Commissioner Eggert felt that most people will want to <br />comply as they feel very protective of the turtles. <br />Commissioner Bowman pointed out that Indian River Shores has <br />a very fine ordinance and the Audubon Society was invited up <br />there last turtle season to make a check and found only a couple <br />of violations, which were corrected. <br />Director Keating stated that the Planning & Zoning <br />Commission did make one change in.the ordinance in that existing <br />development does not have to make any physical changes, because <br />in most cases draperies can be pulled or the lights simply turned <br />off. However, it was felt that the lights in public parks and <br />public accesses should be shielded. Director Keating did not <br />know to what extent that would impact the County parks or how <br />many of those lights involve the City of Vero Beach. <br />Chairman Scurlock felt that raised the question of whether <br />our ordinance is more restrictive than the City's, but Attorney <br />Vitunac advised that the City would have to take an active step <br />to get out of our ordinance. <br />Commissioner Bird felt that while it is very worthwhile to <br />protect the environment, particularly endangered species, he <br />hoped what we are creating here allows enough lighting in those <br />beachfront areas to provide for the security and protection of <br />20 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.