My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2/17/1987
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1987
>
2/17/1987
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:59:17 AM
Creation date
6/12/2015 1:44:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
02/17/1987
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
86
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
noted the county can either have something that will grace the <br />causeway or blight it, and the choice is the Commission's. <br />Commissioner Eggert expressed concern about 6th Ave. and <br />asked if there is any room for it to be widened in the area where <br />it meets 17th St. <br />It was noted that we do not have very much right-of-way in <br />that location, and Commissioner Bird believed some of the right- <br />of-way lines on 6th Avenue cut back practically to people's <br />porches. Chairman Scurlock did not feel the extension of the <br />Boulevard will eliminate the stress of 6th Avenue but just <br />alleviate it some. <br />Commissioner Bird asked how we would approach it if we <br />should want to go commercial, i.e., by a node? <br />Planner Shearer felt the way to approach this would be to <br />provide more flexibility to the U.S.I corridor, which generally <br />runs 600' deep'; we could say that could run all the way to 6th <br />Avenue and could put a condition on it that would limit it to the <br />property on 17th Street. <br />Discussion continued re OCR instead of commercial, and <br />Chairman Scurlock stated that given the constraints of only 2.5 <br />acres, he personally felt OCR is a better approach than <br />commercial as it is a less intense use. <br />Commissioner Eggert commented that if you eliminate the uses <br />listed in their Declaration of Restrictions, she did not know <br />what they cannot do under OCR that they would want to do. <br />Attorney Henderson explained that the Restrictions are in- <br />tended to eliminate about all commercial uses except retail sales <br />and service uses, and under OCR those would only be allowed as an <br />accessory use in a limited space. <br />Planner Shearer confirmed OCR would only allow accessory <br />retail use, and that use could not be free standing; however, it <br />does allow "carry -out only" restaurants, for instance, so you <br />basically could have 20% of the first floor of your building as a <br />21 BOOK <br />� FEB 17 1987 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.