Laserfiche WebLink
r7+•11;4-,-� <br />The subject property is not currently served by County water or <br />wastewater facilities. However, County water is scheduled to be <br />supplied to the area between 1988 and 1992. <br />CONCLUSIONS _. <br />Due -to the fact that the subject property is surrounded on three <br />(3) sides by the LD -2 land use designation, is located less than --- <br />J-. mile .-from U _S...__1, . is located on a primary collector, and is <br />scheduled to be supplied with County water facilities by 1992, <br />the existing LD -.2 land use. designation. is more appropriate than <br />the.LD-1. land use designation. <br />RECOMMENDATION <br />_.• Based on the policies which were established by the Board of <br />County Commissioners on July 23, 1986, when they adopted the <br />revisions to the Winter Beach Precise Land Use Map, the Planning <br />Department intiated the request to redesignate the subject <br />property from LD -2 to LD -1 and to rezone it from RS -6 to RS -3. <br />On September 11, 1986, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted <br />4 -to -0 to recommend approval of the County -initiated requests to <br />redesignate 466 acres located in Winter Beach from LD -2 to LD -1, <br />to rezone 457 acres from RS -6 to RS -3, and to rezone 35.4 acres- - <br />adjacent to the South Winter Beach Industrial Node from RS -6 to - <br />RM -6. <br />Although the planning staff respects the policies established by <br />the -Board and the recommendations made by the Planning and Zoni^g <br />Commission, the staff still feels that its original proposal for <br />this area was correct and continues -to recommend that the subject <br />property retain its LD -2 -land use designation. <br />Planner Shearer advised that the rezoning for the 250 acres <br />was accomplished on October 21st and none is needed today. <br />Commissioner Eggert had a lot of trouble with the fact that <br />the area rezoned to RS -3 where people have built on minimum 1/2 <br />acre and much larger lots is completely surrounded by RS -6. She <br />did not feel we have done a thing to protect this neighborhood <br />but rather <br />have ended <br />up <br />entrapping <br />it. She stated <br />that she <br />personally <br />would like <br />to <br />look at the <br />whole 466 acres <br />again as a <br />part -of the rezoning. <br />Commissioner Wheeler was in full agreement. <br />Chairman Scurlock felt that could be taken up separately, <br />and that after we conduct the advertised public hearing, we could <br />have a vote for the staff to readdress the whole area. <br />Commissioner Eggert noted that it will make a difference in <br />how she votes now because if we were to change this to LD -1 now, <br />we entrap certain people up there in an area that is all LD -2, <br />l <br />��� 49 BOOK <br />