My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2/24/1987
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1987
>
2/24/1987
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:59:17 AM
Creation date
6/12/2015 1:44:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
02/24/1987
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
80
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Bowman felt that we should grant them an <br />immunity or have them come in and get vested. <br />Attorney O'Haire urged the Board to do both. <br />There being no others who wished to be heard in this matter, <br />the Chairman declared the.Public Hearing closed. <br />Chairman Scurlock suggest°ed that the Board go ahead and pass <br />the ordinance today, and then address the specifics that affect <br />Mr. Cury and a few others, which will give staff a little time to <br />come up with a plan of attack. <br />Commissioner Wheeler was in favor of the ordinance because <br />he felt that new people will be aware of the existing uses and <br />can choose whether or not to move into the area. In addition, he <br />felt the attitude of the people in that neighborhood is live and <br />let live, and stressed that the people up there have pride in <br />their homes, businesses, and neighborhood. <br />MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Wheeler, SECONDED by <br />Commissioner Eggert, that the Board adopt Ordinance <br />87-22, providing additional home occupation uses; and <br />direct staff to find a way to recognize the existing <br />businesses. <br />Attorney Vitunac advised that there is a way to see if the <br />use is legal, but Commissioner Eggert said that was not the <br />intent of the Motion. The Motion was to find a way to make the <br />existing uses legal. <br />Attorney Vitunac understood that the intent of the Motion is <br />to direct the County Attorney to find a vehicle for accomplishing <br />making what is there legal, and to make the people who are <br />legally grandfathered in a valid conforming use in the future. <br />Commissioner Bowman asked for clarification of how we are <br />planning to legalize the grandfathered businesses, and Attorney <br />Vitunac explained that first a study would be done to find out <br />who is grandfathered under this new ordinance and then write a <br />49 Boor. 7 P k ,,,E 4'? -',y <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.