Laserfiche WebLink
:MAR <br />i300K f',tiCF.50 <br />Engineer Darrell McQueen confirmed that there are a hundred <br />or more wells on the barrier island. He believed there is a good <br />chance the lens does extend down that far, but not in the quality <br />of drinking water. <br />The Chairman thanked Dr. Toth for his presentation. <br />APPEAL RE C.O.#5, JAIL, PHASE I - COST OF RELOCATING ARCHITECT'S <br />AND CONTRACTOR'S TRAILER <br />Chairman Scurlock referred to the following letter from RSH <br />Constructors: <br />4 saff <br />Constructors <br />Earl N. Shlmp III <br />QcomMISSIC=ERS)'�� <br />987 OISTRIBUuf`idi'dL'�STFebruary 12, 1987 V® Commissioners <br />oAdministrator <br />i+sr. Don C. Scurlock, Jr. Attorney E� Personnel _— <br />Board of County Commissioners Public Works <br />1840 25th Street Community Dev. <br />Vero Beach, Florida 32960 Utilities <br />RE: Indian River County Jaile <br />Other <br />Phase One (1) <br />Dear Commissioner Scurlock: <br />With reference to the Indian River County Jail, we have been advised by <br />Frizzell Architects that Change Order Number Five (5) in the amount of <br />$545.00 for the additional cost to relocate power, telephone and grounding <br />_for the Architects and Contractors trailer has been denied. <br />This is to advise you that RSH Constructors appeals this decision and <br />requests that this situation be brought forth before the Board and <br />reconsidered. <br />In order to provide you with a brief history of this situation, when RSH <br />Constructors commenced construction on the new jail, there was no other <br />construction being performed on site. In addition, there were no other <br />contracts for any other phases to be constructed. The only additional <br />work scheduled at that time was the site work and paving to be performed <br />by the County. <br />In order to locate the office trailers, RSH Constructors verbally <br />discussed this with representatives of the County and the Architect, <br />including discussions at both the site and at the pre -construction <br />conference. Our intention at that time was to locate the trailers in such <br />a place as to avoid interference with the site work and•paving being <br />performed by the County. During this time, there was no direction to RSH <br />Constructors of any potential interferencewith future construction <br />activities. <br />54 <br />