Laserfiche WebLink
Also, you may recall that the County and the Architect was extremely <br />excited about the groundbreaking ceremonies prior to construction. RSH <br />Constructors was requested to expedite the location and installation of <br />the office trailers on site so that the groundbreaking could occur and so <br />Photographs could be taken with the contractors presence on site. Again,. <br />there was every opportunity for the Architect and the Owner to advi�� RSH <br />Constructors if the trailer location presented a potential interference <br />with future construction. <br />After Indian River County awarded Phase II of the jail to an alternate <br />contractor, RSH Constructors was directed to relocate the Architects and <br />Contractors trailer. Not only did this relocation require moving the <br />trailers, but the power, telephone, grounding and plumbing bad to be <br />relocated. The additional cost incurred to RSH Constructors for this <br />relocation should certainly be reimbursed by the party which received <br />benefit from this relocation. In this situation, clearly the Owner <br />received the benefit as the original location of the trailers in no way <br />represents an error on the part of the contractor. <br />Also, please note that approval has been recommended by the Architect and <br />by the Indian River County staff as evidenced by Indian River County <br />interoffice memorandum dated January 14, 1987 from Mr. H. T. Dean to the <br />Honorable Members of the Board of County Commissioners. <br />Based on the above, this is to request that the Board of County <br />Commissioners of Indian River County reverse their previous decision and <br />approve Change Order Number Five (5) in the amount of $545.00. Should the <br />Board elect not to approve our Change Order Number Five (5), we demand <br />that we be advised of the Article and paragraph of the General Conditions <br />of the Contract which are being cited in order to deny our request. <br />In closing, we feel that the decision on the part of the Commissioners is <br />incorrect and should we be required to appear before the Board, additional <br />expenses will be incurred due to the travel and time required from <br />Jacksonville, Florida to Vero Beach, Florida. This additional expense <br />would not have been incurred if the Board of County Commissioners had <br />properly approved our request initially. Therefore, should we be required <br />to appear before the Board to defend this item, an additional $600.00 will <br />be required, consisting of eight (8) hours employee time at $50.00 per <br />hour plus $200.00 travel expense. <br />Upon receipt of this letter, kindly contact me and hopefully a <br />satisfactory resolution can be reached. I look forward to your prompt <br />response. <br />Sincerely yours, <br />Earl N. Shimp, III <br />The Chairman took exception to the last paragraph of the <br />letter, emphasizing that the Board did not require them to come <br />to any meeting, and we don't have to pay for any such expenses. <br />He also did not appreciate them contacting our auditors as was <br />done. <br />Earl Shimp, Vice President of RSH Constructors, thanked the <br />Board for the opportunity to readdress this situation, stating <br />that he would address the Chairman's remarks at the conclusion of <br />55 <br />BOOK 67 JL 510. <br />