3/3/1987 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

IF, --I MAR 3 1987 l BOOK his presentation. Mr. Shimp proceeded to present a detailed history of the events leading up to today and read verbatim from the project specifications, Sec. 015004, Page 4, which states that temporary support facilities are to be located for the convenience of the user (which is the contractor and the architect) and for minimum interference with construction activities. He explained that what RSH did was take the site plan of the site, made a survey of all the various utilities, considered their construction activities as well as all the paving which was County performed, and from that decided on a location for the trailers. Chairman Scurlock asked if they took the drainage into consideration, as he believed part of the relocation was necessitated as much by the drainage that had to be accomplished on the site as any of the other factors mentioned by Mr. Shimp. Mr. Shimp stated that they took into account all the drainage that affected their work. Commissioner Eggert asked if the site plan was the overall site plan for all the phases or just for the building they were to construct, and Mr. Shimp stated the site plan they have does illustrate with a dotted line future inmate housing but with no dimensions - no size, no shape. Commissioner Eggert understood that the trailer was located on a future building site, and Mr. Shimp agreed it is certainly within the confines of the new facility and that is why they moved it. As to whether it is within the dotted lines, there were no dimensions to lay it out. Questions continued as to the site plan Mr. Shimp has, and Chairman Scurlock believed they had dimensions on other drawings and could have overlaid those on their site plan to figure sizes. Mr. Shimp stressed that the documents say you cannot scale drawings. Mr. Shimp next reviewed in detail the sequence of the various change orders, noting that on August 5, RSH requested 56