Laserfiche WebLink
Bou 67 rnLI 517 <br />the benefit. Also it is a question of timing. The developer can <br />elect simply to wait until we pave the road and then he can come <br />in and develop anyway. <br />Discussion continued at length re timing, benefits, etc., <br />and Commissioner Eggert noted that the developer cannot proceed <br />with his project until this is paved. <br />Attorney Vitunac agreed, but pointed out that he can put in <br />a 30' road, and we want a 50' road. <br />Commissioner Bird inquired about the value of the right-of- <br />way donation, and County Right -of -Way Agent Finney advised that <br />20' additional R/W amounts to 6/10 of an acre or $2,985. The <br />assessment is very close to the Property Appraiser's value. <br />The Chairman suggested we accept staff's recommendation to <br />make the improvements under the petition paving program. <br />ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Com- <br />missioner Bowman, the Board unanimously approved <br />Alternative No. 2 as recommended by staff in memo <br />dated February 19, 1987. <br />CITY OF VERO BEACH PROPOSAL RE JOINT CONSTRUCTION OF BRIDGE OVER <br />MAIN CANAL AT COUNTRY CLUB_DRIVE <br />Public Works Director Davis reviewed the following memo: <br />