Laserfiche WebLink
MAR 2 4 M7 <br />BOOK 6 7 F'ACUE 742 <br />Alternative #1 has the advantage of requiring that'all uncompleted <br />portions of the total site area be brought up to current <br />standards. However, the completion of the substantially built 40 <br />units in phase 3 would be tied to modifications of other areas of <br />the project. This would delay completion of the abandoned units <br />and could jeopardize the anticipated completion of these units. <br />Alternative #2 has the advantage of bringing the entire project <br />area, including the area of existing and occupied units up to <br />current standards. However, this could "penalize" completion and <br />redevelopment of the remaining phases which are under different <br />ownership than the completed and occupied units. Again, this <br />would delay completion of the abandoned units and could jeopardize <br />the anticipated completion of these units. <br />Alternative #3 is advantageous for continuing development at <br />densities higher than currently allowed. However, no assurance of <br />bringing any portion of the project site into conformance with <br />current regulations could be gained. This alternative is more <br />than the current owners are requesting and would grandfather -in a <br />development that has failed and is nonconforming. <br />Alternative #4 recognizes that phase 3 is substantially complete <br />and facilitates its completion. Other advantages are that it <br />requires all other phases to be re-site planned and brought into <br />conformance with current regulations. Furthermore, it would <br />accomplish the present owner's desire to complete what has to be <br />finished (phase 3) and re -plan the rest. However, alternative #4 <br />does not bring into conformance the density of existing units or <br />the partially completed 40 units in phase 3. <br />It is staff's opinion that alternative #4 is the best alternative <br />because it: <br />1. facilitates completion of 40 substantially completed units; <br />2. requires re-site planning and thus conformance with current <br />regulations for phases 4, 5, 6, and 7; and <br />3. it satisfies the current owner's request. <br />Alternative #4 appears to be the best way to allow the project to <br />be completed and "turned around" while ensuring that at least 55% <br />of the total project area will be brought into conformance with. <br />current regulations. <br />RECOMMENDATION: <br />Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve <br />Alternative #4 and allow the re -activation of permits needed to <br />complete phase 3 of Waverly Place as previously approved [site <br />plan file SP -82-09-125] and that the Board terminate the site plan <br />approval for phases 4, 5, 6, and 7 of Waverly Place. <br />93 <br />M <br />