My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3/24/1987
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1987
>
3/24/1987
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:59:17 AM
Creation date
6/12/2015 1:48:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
03/24/1987
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
129
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ON MOTION by Commissioner Wheeler, SECONDED by <br />Commissioner Eggert, the Board unanimously approved <br />Alternate #4 of staff's recommendation, allowing the <br />reactivation of permits needed to complete phase 3 of <br />Waverly Place as previously approved, and terminating <br />the site plan approval for phases 4, 5, 6, and 7 of <br />Waverly Place. <br />PROPOSED SOUTH COUNTY REGIONAL PARK MASTER PLAN <br />The Board reviewed the following memo dated 3/17/87: <br />TO: The Honorable Members of the DATE: march 9, 1987 FILE: <br />Board of County Commissioners <br />THROUGH: <br />Charles P. Balczun, <br />County Administrator SUBJECT: <br />Review of Proposed Draft - <br />Beach Preservation Plan of <br />- - Indian River County <br />FROM: James w. Davis, P.EREFERENCES: <br />Public Works Director ? - <br />In reviewing the subject draft, my comments follow: <br />Section I - Description of County <br />Geographic - Line 11-12, The Town of Orchid is not mentioned as an <br />incorporated area. Even though the Town has no ocean frontage, its <br />development could have a major impact on the Coastline. <br />Geomorphology of the Coastal Areas - Plate # 1 is not included to show <br />offshore reef. If the reef is not known as to location, how can a <br />proper analysis be conducted? Was any offshore investigation per- <br />formed? NQAA charts should show bathymetry and hydrography. <br />Explain storm wave susceptibility to erosion. <br />Socio -Economic Characteristics - Table 3 - Indian River Shores has <br />less than 51.7% of its shoreline land use vacant. <br />There does not appear to be any projections of what new development <br />impact will have on beaches as Table of Content suggests. <br />Section II - Coastal Development <br />In paragraph 1, are seawalls considered a "significant coastal structure'. <br />The seawalls, old groins, etc., have not been mentioned in "History of <br />Coastal Development". Recently, there has been much local debate on their <br />effect. <br />4 1987 g4 BOOK D F'�E4J <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.