Laserfiche WebLink
19. Rule 9J -5.010(3)(b)(3) requires adequate sites for housing <br />for low and moderate income families. <br />Comment: The immediate vicinity of this propose �1 amendment is <br />comprised of several established, well-maintaineld, moderate <br />income residential neighborhoods. The site of the proposed <br />amendment could easily develop in a similar manner if the <br />plan is not amended. , <br />20. Rule 9J -5.015(3)(b) requires an intergovernmental coordi- <br />nation element with objectives to coordinate the County plan <br />with the plan of a City which provides service but has no <br />regulatory authority over the use of the land, and to address <br />the impacts of developments on adjacent municipalities. <br />Comment: "Coordination of the local comprehensive plan with <br />the plans of adjacent municipalities ... shall be a major <br />objective of the local comprehensive planning process." <br />F.S. 163.3177(4)(a). Taking this legislative mandate seriously <br />would result in careful consideration of the impact of this <br />proposed amendment on nearby stable residential neighborhoods. <br />Additional traffic and safety problems, delivery trucks and <br />garbage pickup noise and changing neighborhood character are <br />all likely impacts. The City Planning and Zoning Board rejected <br />this proposed amendment 7-2, and the City will be the provider <br />of wastewater service to this site. <br />CONCLUSION <br />From the above analysis, Citizens for Responsible Zonling conclude <br />that the proposed amendment to the Comprehensive Plan is not <br />consistent with the overall provisions and purposes of the <br />Comprehensive Plan. Since the internal consistency requirement for <br />plan amendments under F.S. 163.3187(2) are not met, this proposed <br />plan amendment should be denied by the Board of County Commissioners. <br />The pertinent documents cited to in these comments are attached <br />as exhibits and/or incorporated by reference. <br />-6- <br />Prepared by: <br />WILLIAM G. COLLINS II,ATTORNEY AT LAW. SUITE 408/ BARNETT BANK BLDG./ 601 TWENTY FIRST STREET f VERO BEACH FLORIDA 329601 TELEPHONE 13051 562 -WW <br />Attorney Collins entered into the record a certified copy of <br />the Minutes of the December 18, 1986, meeting of the Planning and <br />Zoning Board of the City of Vero Beach. (Those minutes have been <br />placed on file in the Office of the Clerk to the Court.) <br />Attorney Collins concluded his presentation by emphasizing that <br />the Citizens for Responsible Zoning conclude that the proposed <br />amendment to the Comprehensive Land Use Plan is not consistent <br />with the overall provisions and purposes of the Comp Plan, and <br />since 12 requirements for consistency are not met under Florida <br />Statute, feet this proposed Comp Plan amendment should be denied <br />by the Board of County Commissioners. <br />Commissioner Eggert asked staff if the County is still <br />functioning under the 9J.5 requirements, and Robert Keating, <br />61 BOOK FAG - <br />APR 14.987 <br />