My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4/14/1987
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1987
>
4/14/1987
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:59:18 AM
Creation date
6/12/2015 1:30:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
04/14/1987
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
114
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DESCRIPTION & CONDITIONS <br />Michael O'Haire, an agent for Penn Mobil Partnership, Ronald <br />Hatala and Daryl Stenger, the owners, is requesting !,to amend the <br />Comprehensive Plan by redesignating 3 acres located 200 feet east <br />of U.S. 1 and south of 35th Street from MD -1, Medium -Density <br />Residential 1 (up to 8 units/acre), to MXD, Mixed -Use District <br />(up to 6 units/acre), and to rezone this property from RNI-6, <br />Multiple -Family Residential District, (up to 6 units/acre), to <br />CG, General Commercial District. <br />The owners would like to develop this property for retail <br />businesses and mini -storage facilities. <br />On March 12, 1987, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted <br />5 -to -0 to recommend approval of amending the Comprehensive Plan <br />and rezoning the west 150 feet of the subject property. The <br />Planning and Zoning Commission denied the request for the east <br />550 feet of the subject property because of the configuration of <br />the subject property which is extremely deep east -west and narrow <br />north -south. The applicants have appealed this decision. <br />ALTERNATIVES & ANALYSIS <br />In this section, an analysis of the reasonableness of the appli- <br />cation will be presented. The analysis will include a descrip- <br />tion of the current and future land uses of the site and sur- <br />rounding areas, potential impacts on the transportation and <br />utility systems, and any significant adverse impacts on environ- <br />mental quality. <br />Existing Land Use Pattern <br />The subject property is undeveloped. North of the subject <br />property are single-family residences and mobile homes zoned <br />RM -6. East of the subject property is undeveloped' land zoned <br />RM -6. South of the subject property are single-family dwellings, <br />mobile homes and vacant land in the County zoned RM -6 and <br />single-family dwellings, vacant land and a used car dealer in the <br />City of Vero Beach zoned commercial. West of the subject <br />property is a single-family house with a detached garage and <br />accessory apartment in the City of Vero Beach zoned commercial. <br />Further west is U.S. 1 and the F.E.C. railroad. <br />Future Land Use Pattern <br />The Comprehensive Plan designates the subject property and the <br />land east, south and immediately north of it as MD -1, <br />Medium -Density Residential 1 (up to 8 units/acre). Approximately <br />150 feet north of the subject property is_ the 205 acre <br />hospital/ commercial node centered around Indian River Memorial <br />Hospital. The land west of the subject property is designated <br />commercial by Vero Beach's Comprehensive Plan. <br />During the Spring of 1986, the City and County planning staffs <br />studied the area around the subject property to determine the <br />appropriate zoning. At that time, the City was considering <br />detaching the area east of U.S. 1 and north of the Main Relief <br />Canal from the City Limits. The County Planning staff <br />recommended that if the property was detached from the City that <br />the County establish an MXD, Mixed Use District, running 350 feet <br />east of the existing east right-of-way line of U.S. 1 from 35th <br />Street south to 33rd Street and zone this area CL, Limited <br />Commercial District. The Board of County Commissioners <br />considered this recommendation in June of 1986 and agreed with <br />the staff recommendation for the MXD area but felt that the CG, <br />General Commercial District, would be more appropriate',. <br />79 <br />APR 14 1987 <br />BOOK 1) F�;F ! <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.