My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5/5/1987
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1987
>
5/5/1987
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/2/2023 11:14:12 AM
Creation date
6/12/2015 1:33:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
05/05/1987
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
60
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Eggert agreed it is difficult and pointed out <br />that when the Comprehensive Plan was developed, we could not <br />scrutinize every area as closely as possibly it deserved. She <br />further noted that she has invested in a great deal of property <br />throughout the United States, and there is always a risk involved <br />in purchasing property, the same as when you purchase stock. She <br />stated she also is very supportive of affordable housing, but <br />more in the 8 or 10 upa range than when we are debating between 3 <br />and 6 upa. <br />Rebecca Hampton, president of the Winter Beach Progressive <br />League, handed out a map showing the trend for development <br />occurring on large acreages in this area, and advised that in the <br />last 11 years, they have had 10 homes spring up on multi -acre <br />parcels. She urged that the Commission recognize the character <br />of the neighborhood and the environmentally sensitive area with <br />native scrub, oaks, pines, etc. She stressed that they are not <br />asking the developers not to build, but just asking that they do <br />not build more than 3 upa, and they feel that is a compromise. <br />Commissioner Bird asked Mr. Mooney what his proposed density <br />would be, and Mr. Mooney believed it would be about 3.29. <br />Commissioner Bird asked what the highest density subdivision <br />is that has been done at RS -6, and Director Keating advised that <br />without going PRD, the highest would be about 4. <br />Commissioner Bird referred to the map presented earlier <br />which showed the many property owners desiring to stay RS -6, and <br />Mrs. Hampton stressed they have a map which shows RS -6 is very <br />inconsistent with what has been coming into their area. <br />Commissioner Bird cited the transition from industrial <br />at the railroad and the waste collection center. He noted that <br />the Commission did approve RS -3 on the north of 69th Street, and <br />he felt the south side ought to be RS -3 for some depth also and <br />then have a transition to the RS -6. He agreed the environmental <br />issue is important, but had a problem with it unless the <br />Commission has some plans to acquire that land. <br />23 <br />MAY 5 1987 <br />B00r 68 fAE 2:}?.; <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.