My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5/5/1987
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1987
>
5/5/1987
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/2/2023 11:14:12 AM
Creation date
6/12/2015 1:33:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
05/05/1987
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
60
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
IP <br />0N <br />4 <br />lJ <br />N <br />w <br />TH $7` <br />EMMEN <br />EENIME <br />Il67:. <br />• �NTOi <br />37T11 PL. <br />m n 0I0 <br />M <br />01m <br />Il <br />Il <br />3T'L, ST. BARBER AVE <br />SUBJECT <br />R -O -W <br />The Chairman asked if anyone present wished to be heard. <br />Attorney William Collins came before the Board representing <br />the petitioner. He advised that a year ago in January, the Board <br />changed the zoning codes. At that time this property had C -1A <br />zoning, and the required setbacks were 10', which gave Mr. Malone <br />1830 sq. ft. of buildable area. This vicinity, however, <br />eventually ended up in the Medical/Commercial Node, which they <br />feel is appropriate, but the net effect of that change was that <br />their setbacks were increased to 25', which reduced the buildable <br />area. Attorney Collins was in favor of staff's recommendation <br />for abandonment, but stated the Board has a basic problem with <br />their request to maintain an easement. He noted that 20' would <br />be abandoned to Mr. Malone and 20' abandoned to the owners on the <br />east, which is the county; so, the County still owns fee simple <br />to the R/W and you can't give yourself an easement in something <br />you already own. <br />Attorney Vitunac agreed and noted that the county may have <br />to reestablish that easement in the future, but he did not see <br />how that affects the petitioner's property. <br />51 <br />l MAY 5 1987 <br />BOOS? U Fb,; ?t1414 <br />y <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.