My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5/12/1987
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1987
>
5/12/1987
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:59:18 AM
Creation date
6/12/2015 1:34:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
05/12/1987
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
47
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
BOOK 8 F� j E 30 <br />Attorney Vitunac advised that we are doing this legally, but <br />the Board can, as a policy matter, make additional requirements <br />for obtaining proposals. He noted that many counties use a <br />rotating list of appraisers. <br />Commissioner Bird felt that if we are negotiating with them <br />directly, he was depending on staff to make sure that the prices <br />are competitive; otherwise, he felt we need to go with an open <br />bidding type process. <br />Administrator Balczun suggested that a good alternative <br />method would be to request annual proposals for service and rank <br />them in order of the respondents. <br />Commissioners Bird and Wheeler felt we should proceed with <br />that approach and comprise a list of prequalified appraisers, <br />giving their prices, availability, and expertise in certain <br />areas. <br />Chairman Scurlock felt that it would be nice to hire our own <br />appraiser because these appraisals begin to add up when we spend <br />$5,000-$10,000 at a time. <br />Commissioner Eggert pointed out that we have our own <br />-- appraiser now, but there are times when we get into court <br />challenges. <br />Chairman Scurlock believed that staff understood the Board's <br />direction in this matter. <br />THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. The Motion <br />was voted on and carried unanimously. <br />DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION OF SOLID WASTE BILLING SYSTEM <br />The Board reviewed the following memo dated 4/22/87: <br />34 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.