My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5/19/1987
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1987
>
5/19/1987
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/5/2018 1:16:37 PM
Creation date
6/12/2015 1:35:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
05/19/1987
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
83
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MAY 19 1987 <br />BOOP( 68 FK,L 353 <br />TO: The Honorable Members DATE: May 5, 1987 FILE: <br />of the Board of County <br />Commissioners <br />DIVISION HEAD CONCURRENCE: <br />obert M. Kea <br />ng, L' CP <br />SUBJECT: CAMPO/BOLINGER REQUEST <br />TO REZONE 9.56 ACRES FROM <br />Planning & De'elopment Director A-1, AGRICULTURAL DIST- <br />RICT, TO RM-, MULTIPLE - <br />FAMILY RESIDENTIAL <br />DISTRICT <br />FROM: Richard M. Shearer, REFERENCES: <br />Chief, Long -Range Planning <br />It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal <br />consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at their <br />regular meeting of May 19, 1987. <br />DESCRIPTION & CONDITIONS <br />Jack Campo, an agent for Richard Bolinger, trustee, is requesting <br />to rezone 9.56 acres located on the north side of 8th Street and <br />approximately one-quarter mile west of 82nd Avenue from A-1., <br />Agricultural District (up to 1 unit/5 acres), to RM -6, <br />Multiple -Family Residential District (up to 6 units/acre). <br />The applicant intends to develop this property for residential <br />housing. <br />On April 9, 1987 the Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed the <br />applicant's original request to rezone this parcel to RM -8, <br />Multi -Family Residential District (up to 8 units/acre). Staff <br />recommended that this request be denied and instead that the site <br />be rezoned to RS -6, Single -Family Residential (up to 6 <br />units/acre). The Planning and Zoning Commission concluded that <br />RM -8 was too high a density for this area due to the <br />characteristics of the area and the existing densities' based on <br />this determination they voted 7-0 to deny the request for RM -8. <br />However, on a subsequent motion they voted 5-2 to recommend to <br />the Board of County Commissioners that the subject property be <br />rezoned to RM -6. The applicants agreed to this decision. <br />ALTERNATIVES & ANALYSIS <br />In this section, an analysis of the reasonableness of the appli- <br />cation will be presented. The analysis will include a descrip- <br />tion of the current and future land uses of the site and sur- <br />rounding areas, potential impacts on the transportation and <br />utility systems, and any significant adverse impacts on environ- <br />mental quality. <br />Existing Land Use Pattern <br />The subject property is undeveloped. North of the subject <br />property is a mobile home park developed at a density of 6.5 <br />units per acre which is zoned RMH-8, Mobile Home Residential <br />District (up to 8 units/acre). East of the subject property is <br />undeveloped land zoned A-1 and three single-family dwellings <br />zoned RS -1, Single -Family Residential District (up to 1 unit/ - <br />acre). South of the subject property, across 8th Street, are <br />citrus groves and the County's west sub -regional wastewater <br />treatment plan zoned A-1. West of the subject property are two <br />single-family dwellings and undeveloped land zoned A-1. Approxi- <br />mately one-quarter mile west of the subject property on the south <br />side of 8th Street is a 145 acre sod farm which was rezoned in <br />February from A-1 to RS -3, Single -Family Residential District (up <br />to 3 units/acre). <br />36 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.