My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5/19/1987
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1987
>
5/19/1987
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/5/2018 1:16:37 PM
Creation date
6/12/2015 1:35:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
05/19/1987
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
83
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Future Land Use Pattern <br />The Comprehensive Plan designates the subject property and the <br />land north, east and west of it as MD -1, Medium -Density <br />Residential 1 (up to 8 units/acre). The land south of the subject <br />property is designated as AG, Agricultural (up to 1 unit/5 <br />acres). The land approximately one-quarter mile west of the <br />subject property on the south side of 8th Street was redesignated <br />from AG to LD -1, Low -Density Residential 1 (up to 3 units/acre), <br />in February. <br />In reviewing this request, staff notes that even though they are <br />zoned RMH-8, the mobile home parks located north of the subject <br />property are developed at a density of between 5 and 6.5 units <br />per acre, and have many of the characteristics of a typical <br />single-family subdivision. Based on these facts and the fact <br />that the property immediately south of the subject property can <br />only be developed at a density of one unit per 5 acres, the staff <br />feels that a multiple -family zoning designation is inappropriate <br />for the subject property. As an alternative, staff feels that <br />the RS -6, Single -Family Residential District, would be <br />appropriate for the subject property. <br />Transportation System <br />The subject property has direct access to 8th Street (classified <br />as a secondary collector street on the Thoroughfare Plan). The <br />maximum development of the subject property under RM -6 zoning <br />would allow 57 dwelling units which could generate up to 416 <br />average annual daily trips. <br />Environment <br />The subject property is not designated as environmentally <br />sensitive nor is it in a flood -prone area. <br />Utilities <br />A County watermain is located on 8th Street. The County does not <br />currently have capacity at the west subregional wastewater plant <br />to service the subject property. <br />RECOMMENDATION <br />Based on the above analysis, and fully respecting the abilities <br />of the Planning and Zoning Commission, staff must maintain its <br />recommendation that the subject property not be rezoned to RM -6. <br />The staff maintains that the RS -6 district is appropriate for the <br />subject property, and recommends it be rezoned as such. <br />Director Keating noted that this is a difficult request. <br />This property is at the very southern boundary of the RM -8 area; <br />it is surrounded by single family houses on large lots; and it is <br />very difficult to try to determine who is being buffered from <br />whom and provide appropriate transition. <br />Chairman Scurlock believed the type of transition they are <br />talking about is not multi family vs. single family because the <br />mobile homes happen to be single family. Also, there are large <br />homes on large acreages all around this immediate vicinity, and <br />37 <br />MAY 19 197 <br />BOCK 68 m3E 354 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.