My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5/19/1987
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1987
>
5/19/1987
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/5/2018 1:16:37 PM
Creation date
6/12/2015 1:35:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
05/19/1987
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
83
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MAY 1987 <br />BOOK 68 F?H 38 3 <br />half of the property we were discussing earlier is in the City, <br />he did not believe that will leave us enough ability to negotiate <br />with this group to mitigate; so, apparently we need to face <br />facts, go ahead and acquire R/W and mitigate on site. <br />Commissioner Eggert wished to know if the City Council is <br />telling us the same thing as Mr. Little and the Mayor. <br />Chairman Scurlock advised that he has talked with Councilman <br />Michael Wodtke and Mayor John Acor, both of whom have indicated <br />they would prefer the area to be left alone. The other problem <br />they have is that they are on record as taking a position of <br />replacing the Barber Bridge to the north of the existing bridge, <br />which comes right through some of the Caldwell and other <br />property. He believed that group is looking at filling in 22 <br />acres and ending up with about 400 buildable lots. <br />Director Davis was not quite sure that he understood why the <br />transfer of development rights is an issue. He believed it is <br />possible for them to get the number of units in the density they <br />have without transferring and felt it would be premature to say <br />that would be an obstacle before we see their development plan. <br />Discussion ensued regarding the need to pursue this with the <br />City, and Chairman Scurlock noted the problem would be that we <br />could get bogged down going through Planning staff with the City, <br />and he did not believe we want to make all of our plans contin- <br />gent on that when we are ready to build the Boulevard. We need <br />to go through the permitting process with Boyle, and he felt we <br />need to say we are going to build the Boulevard, there is the <br />R/W, and that is where it is going to be. <br />Commissioner Eggert asked if it is possible to request the <br />City Council to verify their position on this situation', and <br />Chairman Scurlock confirmed that he will write the Mayor and ask <br />him to place this before the City Council and give us a response. <br />COMMISSIONER EGGERT WITHDREW HER EARLIER MOTION RE <br />SETTING A SPECIAL JOINT CITY/COUNTY MEETING FOR JUNE 3RD. <br />66 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.