Laserfiche WebLink
MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by <br />Commissioner Wheeler, to direct staff to proceed with <br />the design for the Boulevard that the Public Works <br />Director has been working with and acquire R/W <br />accordingly. <br />Director Davis emphasized that staff has been trying to <br />maintain an arm's length transaction between the owners of the <br />R/W and the county, and to do that we are not only looking at <br />mitigating along the project, but also off the project limits. <br />and he felt that puts the County in a better position. <br />Chairman Scurlock felt if they have another proposal to <br />present which can revolve around our existing R/W and existing <br />mitigation, that is fine. He believed the Motion says here is <br />the alignment; our engineers are going to be developing <br />mitigation; and hopefully we can work together on this. <br />Director Davis suggested that staff come up with three <br />options for mitigation (one for on-site mitigation and two other <br />.alternatives re off-site mitigation). He felt if the Board can <br />approve three options, it would facilitate working with the <br />owners in question to set up more of an arm's length transaction. <br />Chairman Scurlock believed that Director Davis has the <br />direction of the Board. He realized this is a very sensitive <br />situation, and Director Davis is in a tough position. <br />Commissioner Eggert just felt Director Davis should stay in <br />absolute control of it, and Chairman Scurlock reiterated that he <br />will write the City asking for an official confirmation of their <br />position. <br />THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. <br />It was voted on and carried unanimously. <br />67 <br />BOOK 68 E j84 <br />SAY 1 9 1987 <br />