My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6/2/1987
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1987
>
6/2/1987
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:59:19 AM
Creation date
6/12/2015 1:36:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
06/02/1987
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
TO: The Honorable Members DATEMay 22, 1987 F1 LE: _ <br />of -the Board of County <br />Commissioners <br />PROPOSED ADDITIONS TO <br />COASTAL BARRIERIRESOURCES <br />SUBJECT: SYSTEM BY THE U S . ' DEPART- <br />MENT OF INTERI09 <br />Robert M. Keating, AICP <br />FRO Director REFERENCES: <br />Community Development Division <br />It is requested that the information herein presented be given <br />formal consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at <br />their regular meeting of June 2, 1987. <br />DESCRIPTION & CONDITIONS: <br />In 1982, Congress passed the Coastal Barrier Resources Act <br />(CBRA). The purpose of this legislation was to restrict <br />federally subsidized development of undeveloped coastal barriers <br />along the Atlantic and gulf coasts in order to: (1) minimize the <br />loss of human life; (2) reduce the wasteful expenditure of <br />Federal revenues, and (3) reduce damage to fish and wildlife <br />habitat and other valuable natural resources of coastal barri- <br />ers. In conjunction with the Act, Congress designated 186 units <br />comprising 452,834 acres in Atlantic and Gulf coastal areas as <br />units in the Coastal Barriers Resources System (CBRS). The <br />major effect upon an area designated as part of the CBRS is the <br />prohibition of federal funds, including federal flood insurance <br />coverage for new construction, being used within the area or <br />outside the area where those funds would support further devel- <br />opment within the CBRA Unit. <br />Of the 186 CBRS units designated in 1982, two were located <br />partially or fully within Indian River County. The PI -10 Unit is <br />located in the north county in the Ambersand Beach area, while <br />the P -10A Unit is located at the Indian River Count /St. Lucie <br />County line. Comprising a substantial part of the PF -10 Unit is <br />the 84 lot Ambersand Beach Subdivision, where a number of homes <br />existed prior to the 1982 CBRS designation and a number of <br />others have been constructed since then or are under con- <br />struction now. Only those units which existed and had federal <br />flood insurance prior to 1982 may get flood insurance at this <br />time. <br />As part of the CBRA, the Department of Interior) (DOI) was <br />instructed to submit within three years a report to Congress <br />regarding the CBRS. Among other items, this report was to <br />include recommendations for additions or deletions to the <br />system. Recently, DOI released its draft report, ynd in this <br />report it is recommending substantial increases to the P-10 <br />unit. The attached map delineates the existing P-10 unit and <br />the proposed additions to this unit. <br />ALTERNATIVES & ANALYSIS: <br />Expansion of the P-10 Unit of the CBRS would have a substantial <br />impact upon Indian River County. Because of the prohibition of <br />federal flood insurance for new construction in theCBRS unit, <br />the amount of development in that area would drastically de- <br />crease. Land values, and consequently ad valorem tax revenues, <br />would decrease substantially. In addition, various federal <br />9 BOOR 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.