Laserfiche WebLink
ASSSEESQSED �o /21h1--311-/39 <br />TROPOl\!JNA <br />HO NMI <br />SU®DOV <br />eal 4.20 <br />-VI Its <br />— <br />Ac. A <br />GOV. LOT 2 <br />1780• <br />3. R.o ITCH R/W <br />8. <br />A• 160• 100' - �° g <br />r <br />7n � s.si <br />8 _. W_ . . <br />}� _ • A <br />7pTAL. <br />os <br />c000 m <br />V 0 <br />/f/ETL^4it/O.S � <br />5a. is 14C . liq <br />C5. <br />1vc i <br />707-A l <br />21 q� <br />31 <br />39 o i <br />I <br />:U <br />It was noted that Palmetto Avenue connects the other two <br />streets, and Engineer Terry explained that the reason the county <br />wishes to pave (North and South Tropicana Drive and Palmetto Ave. <br />is to eliminate the grader route up at the north end of the <br />county. <br />Vice Chairman Bowman asked why Pelican Pointe was assessed <br />and Engineer Terry explained that it was because they own <br />frontage on Palmetto Avenue. <br />Mr. Cheek confirmed that they were assessed.over $7,000 for <br />the frontage they own on Palmetto, and there is absolutely no way <br />they can ever use this property as building lots because it has <br />been developed for a golf course. There are property owners on <br />the other side of the street who will use the road, but Pelican <br />Pointe would not use it at all. <br />Commissioner Bird believed we have run into this in other <br />situations where we have had lots with dual frontage that were <br />assessed even though they don't use the particular street we are <br />paving as their access point, and he did not know how we differ- <br />entiate. <br />JUN 16 1987 33 BOOS fX6.E51"D <br />L_ <br />