8/25/1987 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

AUG 2 5 1987 �OOK 69 Mr. Munksgaard answered that it was complete, and had been sent to the County Utilities Dept. for public review. Mr. Hawkulie understood that when representatives of Die, Nettles, and Precourt met with CDM on August 5th regarding the Master Plan, they were told that the document was not technically complete and that CDM was not willing to distribute the document _for review until it was complete. Mr. Hawkulie noted that this document was promised to be made available as soon as it was complete, but as of Monday noon, August 24th, it was not released. Die, Nettles believe that the public has not had the opportunity to review the plan with sufficient time to prepare responses to it. Mr. Munksgaard advised that a copy of the document was sent out Federal Express to Die, Nettles last Friday, August 21st. Mr. Hawkulie asked whether the comparative cost effectiveness of having private franchises versus sub -regional systems had been analyzed. Mr. Munksgaard repeated that the Master Plan does not address the individual, small pockets of franchised sewer area. Chairman Scurlock emphasized that the County is presently receiving requests for new franchises, which are, in fact, being issued, as there are areas where it is just not economically feasible to service. He continued to stress that the County's plan has never been to mass sewer the entire county at one time. Mr. Hawkulie asked if the sub -regional plan was considered at the recommendation of the County Commission. How was that decided upon?. Chairman Scurlock felt the answer was "no" if he understood that Mr. Hawkulie's question was asking if the plan contemplates the west regional plant servicing the entire west region. Mr. Hawkulie asked about the process selection for the activated sludge, and Mr. Munksgaard stated that the process was flood flow, complete mix. 45